AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

zealdocs/zeal

SlopCodeMonitor badge for zealdocs/zeal Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

Offline documentation browser. Your personal reference library, searchable in an instant.

2.2 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for zealdocs/zeal, a C++ project with 12,860 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 64,083 lines of code across 185 source files, recording 183 pattern matches distributed across 2 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 2.2 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

2.2
Adjusted Signal
2.2
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-31
Last Push
12.9K
Stars
C++
Language
64.1K
Lines of Code
185
Files
183
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 10.4/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 183 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 0 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 13.8/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 183 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 4LOW 179

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 183 distinct pattern matches across 2 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Over-Commented Block179 hits · 130 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtools/release-prepare.sh1#!/usr/bin/env bashCOMMENT
LOWtools/release-push.sh1#!/usr/bin/env bashCOMMENT
LOWtools/release-delete.sh1#!/usr/bin/env bashCOMMENT
LOWsrc/app/main.cpp1// Copyright (C) Oleg Shparber, et al. <https://zealdocs.org>COMMENT
LOWsrc/app/main.cpp21#include <QStyleHints>COMMENT
LOWsrc/app/main.cpp341 // Tabler glyphs like the rest of the UI. On Windows 10 & 11 base it on Fusion,COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h1//COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h21/*COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h41#ifndef CPPHTTPLIB_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT_USECONDCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h61#ifndef CPPHTTPLIB_CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT_SECONDCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h81#ifndef CPPHTTPLIB_EXPECT_100_THRESHOLDCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h101#ifndef CPPHTTPLIB_IDLE_INTERVAL_USECONDCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h121#ifndef CPPHTTPLIB_REDIRECT_MAX_COUNTCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h141#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h161#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h181#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h201COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h221COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h241#endif //_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGSCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h261#define S_ISREG(m) (((m) & S_IFREG) == S_IFREG)COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h281#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h301#define NI_MAXHOST 1025COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h321#ifndef INVALID_SOCKETCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h341#include <fcntl.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h361#include <unordered_set>COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h381#if defined(CPPHTTPLIB_USE_CERTS_FROM_MACOSX_KEYCHAIN) && \COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h401COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h421#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h441#elif OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x30000000LCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h461#include <mbedtls/ctr_drbg.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h481// 4.x), so version-specific 3.x-only code must check V3 && !V4.COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h501#define WOLFSSL_GEN_DNS 2COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h521#ifdef CPPHTTPLIB_USE_CERTS_FROM_MACOSX_KEYCHAINCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h741//COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h1001 NotExtended_510 = 510,COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h2261 // process_request() wraps only routing() in a try/catch. Content providers,COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h7061// of resources. The listening socket is still usable, so back off briefly andCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h8241COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h9861COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h13681#ifndef _WIN32COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h15581 if (!detail::write_data(strm, data.data(), data.size())) {COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp1//----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp21// v0.5.0: https://toml.io/en/v0.5.0COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp41// OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp61#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp81#undef TOML_CPPCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp101COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp121#define TOML_CLANG __clang_major__COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp141#define TOML_CLANG 13COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp161#ifndef TOML_ICCCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp181#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp201#define TOML_GCC TOML_GCC_LIKECOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp221#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp241#ifndef TOML_ARCH_X86COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp261#define TOML_ARCH_BITNESS 32COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp281#if defined(WIN32) || defined(_WIN32) || defined(__WIN32__) || defined(__NT__) || defined(__CYGWIN__)COMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp301#ifdef __has_includeCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp321#elseCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp341#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/contrib/tomlplusplus/toml++/toml.hpp361COMMENT
119 more matches not shown…
AI Slop Vocabulary4 hits · 12 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h15321 // Cross-host/scheme redirect - create new client with robust setupCOMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h15326// New method for robust redirect client creationCOMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h15388 // Setup client with robust configurationCOMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/contrib/cpp-httplib/httplib.h15396// New method for robust client setup (based on basic_manual_redirect.cppCOMMENT