2.3

Adjusted Signal

2.3

Raw Pattern Score

100%

Time Factor

2026-09-09

Last Push

7.4K

Stars

HTML

Language

41.6K

Lines of Code

382

Files

Pattern Hits

2026-10-31

Scan Date

0.01

HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 9.4/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 51 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 1.2/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 10 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 2.9/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 24 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 10.2/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 63 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal: Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score: Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor: A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits: Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate: High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files: Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 5MEDIUM 1LOW 57

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 63 distinct pattern matches across 7 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Structural Annotation Overuse17 hits · 26 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	78	### Step 1: Confirm the Baseline and Create an Isolated Branch	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	92	### Step 2: Use Worktrees for Complex Tasks	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	103	### Step 3: Give AI a Scoped Task	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	112	### Step 4: Review the Diff Before Committing	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	128	### Step 5: Split Commits	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	155	### Step 6: Run Verification	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	168	### Step 7: Let AI Run the First Review Pass	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	178	### Step 8: Open a PR	COMMENT
LOW	…-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md	190	### Step 9: Merge Only After CI Passes	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	33	## Step 1: Check the Scale of Changes First	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	54	## Step 2: Confirm Ownership; Do Not Clean Up by Calling a Path Irrelevant	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	82	## Step 3: Split Diffs by Intent	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	123	## Step 4: Let AI Perform a Risk Scan	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	140	## Step 5: Manual Verification Focus	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	153	## Step 6: Run Verification	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	170	## Step 7: Write the PR	COMMENT
LOW	…i-native-development_en/ai-change-review-example_en.md	198	## Step 8: If the Diff is Still Too Large	COMMENT

Synthetic Comment Markers5 hits · 25 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
HIGH	…-native-development_en/engineering-change-course_en.md	126	GitHub Actions needs an especially precise object label. For an open `pull_request`, default `GITHUB_REF` is the PR merg	CODE
HIGH	…y-workflow/02-daily-workflow_en/branch-and-merge_en.md	20	- Candidate solutions for code generated by AI Agents	CODE
HIGH	09-resources/09-resources_en/recommended-reading_en.md	78	\| [Review AI-generated code](https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/copilot/tutorials/review-ai-generated-co	CODE
HIGH	00-meta/00-meta_en/release-notes-v2.2.0_en.md	9	- [PR #67](https://github.com/xirong/my-git/pull/67) completed ten paired Git mental-model topics, interactives, and dis	CODE
HIGH	00-meta/00-meta_en/release-notes-v2.2.0_en.md	9	- [PR #67](https://github.com/xirong/my-git/pull/67) completed ten paired Git mental-model topics, interactives, and dis	CODE

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers22 hits · 23 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW⚡	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	173	def test_explicit_timeout_is_used(self):	STRING
LOW⚡	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	176	def test_missing_timeout_is_rejected(self):	STRING
LOW⚡	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	182	def test_empty_timeout_is_rejected(self):	STRING
LOW⚡	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	188	def test_non_integer_timeout_is_rejected(self):	STRING
LOW⚡	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	194	def test_non_positive_timeouts_are_rejected(self):	STRING
LOW	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	216	def test_explicit_timeout_is_used(self):	STRING
LOW	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	229	def test_non_integer_timeout_is_rejected(self):	STRING
LOW	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	235	def test_non_positive_timeouts_are_rejected(self):	STRING
LOW	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	324	def ensure_safe_archive_members(archive: tarfile.TarFile, destination: Path) -> None:	CODE
LOW	labs/ai-agent-incidents/verify.py	240	def check_worktree_protection(root: Path) -> dict[str, str]:	CODE
LOW	labs/git-command-safety/verify.py	94	def test_dirty_precondition_stops_without_mutating(root: Path) -> None:	CODE
LOW	labs/git-command-safety/verify.py	126	def test_path_only_commit_preserves_unrelated_work(root: Path) -> None:	CODE
LOW	labs/git-command-safety/verify.py	178	def test_soft_reset_counterexample_and_corrected_flow(root: Path) -> None:	CODE
LOW	labs/git-command-safety/verify.py	231	def test_non_main_integration_branch(root: Path) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	67	def test_existing_path_ignores_query_and_fragment(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	71	def test_whitespace_and_unicode_path(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	74	def test_encoded_hash_stays_in_filename(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	77	def test_missing_path_with_query_fails(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	80	def test_fragment_and_query_only_targets_do_not_require_a_file(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	84	def test_pages_url_with_query_and_fragment_maps_to_source(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW⚡	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	90	def test_missing_pages_url_fails_even_without_external_checks(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	110	def test_missing_pages_url_makes_no_external_cli_fail(self) -> None:	CODE

Unused Imports10 hits · 10 pts

Severity	File	Line	Context
LOW	labs/ai-change-control/lab.py	4	CODE
LOW	labs/ai-agent-incidents/verify.py	3	CODE
LOW	labs/git-command-safety/verify.py	3	CODE
LOW	labs/git-mental-model/08-remote/lab.py	3	CODE
LOW	labs/git-mental-model/10-storage/lab.py	3	CODE
LOW	labs/git-mental-model/09-worktree/lab.py	3	CODE
LOW	scripts/test-link-checkers.py	3	CODE
LOW	scripts/check-docs.py	2	CODE
LOW	scripts/link_targets.py	2	CODE
LOW	scripts/check-links.py	2	CODE

Deep Nesting6 hits · 6 pts

Severity	File	Line	Context
LOW	labs/git-mental-model/08-remote/lab.py	279	CODE
LOW	labs/git-mental-model/10-storage/lab.py	240	CODE
LOW	labs/git-mental-model/09-worktree/lab.py	241	CODE
LOW	scripts/check-docs.py	114	CODE
LOW	scripts/check-docs.py	146	CODE
LOW	scripts/check-links.py	166	CODE

Modern AI Meta-Vocabulary1 hit · 3 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
MEDIUM	…e-development_en/ai-coding-tools-git-integration_en.md	43	## 6. Cursor: Composer and multi-agent release information	COMMENT

Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping2 hits · 2 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	scripts/check-links.py	188	except Exception as get_error: # noqa: BLE001	CODE
LOW	scripts/check-links.py	194	except Exception as error: # noqa: BLE001	CODE

xirong/my-git

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review