AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

swagger-api/swagger-editor

SlopCodeMonitor badge for swagger-api/swagger-editor Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

Swagger Editor

1.1 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for swagger-api/swagger-editor, a JavaScript project with 9,467 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 47,702 lines of code across 478 source files, recording 32 pattern matches distributed across 5 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 1.1 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

1.1
Adjusted Signal
1.1
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-30
Last Push
9.5K
Stars
JavaScript
Language
47.7K
Lines of Code
478
Files
32
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 5.1/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 32 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.1/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 1 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 3.7/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 32 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 2LOW 30

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 32 distinct pattern matches across 5 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Structural Annotation Overuse24 hits · 38 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md38## Step 0: Upstream Gate (every invocation)COMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md63## Step 1: Research and Tracking DocCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md80## Step 2: DependenciesCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md92## Step 3: Wire the EditorCOMMENT
LOW⚡.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md116## Step 4: Preview CheckCOMMENT
LOW⚡.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md125## Step 5: TestsCOMMENT
LOW⚡.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md135## Step 6: GatesCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-oas-support/SKILL.md151## Step 7: Pull RequestCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md46## Step 0: Classify and Gate (every invocation)COMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md67## Step 1: Research, Profile and DecisionsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md83## Step 2: DependenciesCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md91## Step 3: Wire the EditorCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md102## Step 4: PreviewCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md109## Step 5: TestsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md121## Step 6: GatesCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-spec-support/SKILL.md132## Step 7: Pull RequestsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md43## Step 0: Dialect and Status (every invocation)COMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md61## Step 1: Tracking Doc and Keyword MapCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md74## Step 2: PR 1, Dependencies and DetectionCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md102## Step 3: PR 2, Route to the Swagger UI PreviewCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md120## Step 4: PR 3, Language Features and HighlightingCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md155## Step 5: TestsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md171## Step 6: Gates (each PR)COMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/add-json-schema-support/SKILL.md183## Step 7: Pull RequestsCOMMENT
Over-Commented Block5 hits · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWplaywright.config.ts61 // Configure projects for major browsersCOMMENT
LOWvite/plugins/rewrite-editor-worker-import.js1// ?worker is a Vite-only transform. Without enforce:'pre', Vite's built-inCOMMENT
LOWvite/plugins/inline-all-wasms.js21// so downstream plugins that gate on id.endsWith('.wasm') are bypassed entirely.COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/codeql.yml1# For most projects, this workflow file will not need changing; you simply needCOMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/codeql.yml61 # Initializes the CodeQL tools for scanning.COMMENT
AI Slop Vocabulary1 hit · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM.claude/skills/add-oas-support/scripts/test/smoke.sh54# a crashing command exits 1 and prints no summary: the harness must reject itCOMMENT
Slop Phrases1 hit · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM.github/workflows/codeql.yml55 # If you are analyzing a compiled language, you can modify the 'build-mode' for that language to customize howCOMMENT
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtest/playwright/helpers/setup-helpers.ts39export async function waitForContentPropagation(page: Page): Promise<void> {CODE