Repository Analysis

sherlock-project/sherlock

Hunt down social media accounts by username across social networks

7.0 Low AI signal View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of sherlock-project/sherlock, a Python project with 86,529 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 8,819 lines of code across 43 source files, recording 44 pattern matches distributed across 6 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 7.0 places this repository in the Low AI signal band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

7.0
Adjusted Score
7.0
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-13
Last Push
86.5K
Stars
Python
Language
8.8K
Lines of Code
43
Files
44
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.07
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 3MEDIUM 4LOW 37

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 44 distinct pattern matches across 6 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping14 hits · 18 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMdevel/summarize_site_validation.py68 print(f"Error: File '{xml_path}' does not exist.")CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py373 except Exception:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py377 except Exception:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py469 except Exception:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py478 except Exception:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py714 except Exception as error:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py768 except Exception as error:CODE
MEDIUMsherlock_project/sherlock.py798 print(f"Error: Desired sites not found: {', '.join(site_missing)}.")CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sites.py128 except Exception as error:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sites.py139 except Exception as error:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sites.py150 except Exception as error:CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sites.py179 except Exception:CODE
MEDIUM.github/workflows/validate_modified_targets.yml67 print(f"Error: Could not find {e.filename}", file=sys.stderr)CODE
MEDIUM.github/workflows/validate_modified_targets.yml70 print(f"Error: Could not decode JSON from a file - {e}", file=sys.stderr)CODE
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers17 hits · 17 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/test_unicode.py8def _make_future_with_exception(exc):CODE
LOWtests/test_unicode.py15def test_get_response_handles_unicode_decode_error():CODE
LOWtests/test_unicode.py35def test_get_response_handles_unicode_encode_error():CODE
LOWtests/few_test_basic.py6def test_username_via_message():CODE
LOWtests/test_probes.py30 def test_known_positives_via_message(self, sites_info, site, username):CODE
LOWtests/test_probes.py41 def test_known_positives_via_status_code(self, sites_info, site, username):CODE
LOWtests/test_probes.py50 def test_known_positives_via_response_url(self, sites_info, site, username):CODE
LOWtests/test_probes.py62 def test_likely_negatives_via_message(self, sites_info, site, random_len):CODE
LOWtests/test_probes.py84 def test_likely_negatives_via_status_code(self, sites_info, site, random_len):CODE
LOWtests/test_probes.py98def test_username_illegal_regex(sites_info):CODE
LOWtests/test_manifest.py6def test_validate_manifest_against_local_schema():CODE
LOWtests/test_manifest.py23def test_validate_manifest_against_remote_schema(remote_schema):CODE
LOWtests/test_manifest.py38def test_site_list_iterability (sites_info, target_name, target_expected_err_type):CODE
LOWtests/sherlock_interactives.py23 def walk_sherlock_for_files_with(pattern: str) -> list[str]:CODE
LOWtests/test_ux.py18def test_nsfw_explicit_selection(sites_obj, nsfwsites):CODE
LOWtests/test_ux.py26def test_wildcard_username_expansion():CODE
LOWtests/test_ux.py41def test_no_usernames_provided(cliargs):CODE
Cross-File Repetition3 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHsherlock_project/notify.py0convert object to string. keyword arguments: self -- this object. return value: nicely formatted string to get informatiSTRING
HIGHsherlock_project/result.py0convert object to string. keyword arguments: self -- this object. return value: nicely formatted string to get informatiSTRING
HIGHsherlock_project/sites.py0convert object to string. keyword arguments: self -- this object. return value: nicely formatted string to get informatiSTRING
Redundant / Tautological Comments4 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py341 # Open the file containing account linksCOMMENT
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py728 # Check if both output methods are entered as input.COMMENT
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py755 # Check if it's a valid pull requestCOMMENT
LOWsherlock_project/__main__.py14 # Check if the user is using the correct version of PythonCOMMENT
Deep Nesting5 hits · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/sherlock_interactives.py23CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py173CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py541CODE
LOWsherlock_project/notify.py176CODE
LOWsherlock_project/sites.py79CODE
Unused Imports1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsherlock_project/sherlock.py13CODE