Home / shadow1ng / fscan
AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

shadow1ng/fscan

SlopCodeMonitor badge for shadow1ng/fscan Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

一款内网综合扫描工具，方便一键自动化、全方位漏扫扫描。(An intranet comprehensive scanning tool, enabling one-click automated, all-round vulnerability scanning)

2.5 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for shadow1ng/fscan, a Go project with 14,729 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 166,318 lines of code across 1008 source files, recording 133 pattern matches distributed across 9 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 2.5 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

2.5
Adjusted Signal
2.5
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-01
Last Push
14.7K
Stars
Go
Language
166.3K
Lines of Code
1.0K
Files
133
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 1.2/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 27 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.9/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 8 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 9.7/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 98 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 10.0/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 133 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 2HIGH 1MEDIUM 98LOW 32

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 133 distinct pattern matches across 9 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Decorative Section Separators98 hits · 339 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMcore/port_scan.go884 // ── 阶段 1：网关启发式 ──────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMcore/port_scan.go909 // ── 阶段 2：逐主机兜底（仅对网关未命中的子网）──────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/cassandra.go71// ── raw TCP Cassandra CQL 协议 ──────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/cassandra.go170// ── CQL wire protocol 工具 ──────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/cassandra.go252// ── 错误分类 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/cassandra.go267// ── 无认证 + 服务识别 ──────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/mongodb.go90// ── raw TCP MongoDB SCRAM 认证 ──────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/mongodb.go181// ── MongoDB wire protocol 工具 ──────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/mongodb.go600// ── 服务识别 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/kafka.go66// ── raw TCP Kafka 实现 ──────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/kafka.go154// ── Kafka 协议编解码 ────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/kafka.go220// ── 错误分类 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMplugins/services/kafka.go239// ── 服务识别 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMweb/api/project.go200// ─── HTTP Handlers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml2 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml4 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml26 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml28 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml46 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml48 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml102 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml104 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml166 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml168 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml225 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml227 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml300 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml302 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml317 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml319 # ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml333# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml335# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml375# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMfscan-lab/docker-compose.yml377# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh27# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh29# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh38# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh40# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh45# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh47# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh53# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh55# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh61# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh63# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh69# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh71# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh76# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh78# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh82# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh84# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh91# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh93# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh96# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡fscan-lab/docker/firewall/firewall.sh98# ============================================COMMENT
MEDIUMtests/integration/integration_test.go41// ── Redis ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMtests/integration/integration_test.go86// ── MySQL ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMtests/integration/integration_test.go110// ── PostgreSQL ─────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMtests/integration/integration_test.go134// ── FTP ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMtests/integration/integration_test.go158// ── SSH ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMtests/integration/integration_test.go182// ── MongoDB ────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
38 more matches not shown…
Hallucination Indicators2 hits · 20 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
CRITICALwebscan/pocs/qiyuesuo-template-param-edits-rce.yaml26 {"id":"2","params":[{"expression":"var a=new org.springframework.expression.spel.standard.SpelExpressionParser()CODE
CRITICALwebscan/pocs/qiyuesuo-template-html-add-rce.yaml26 {"file":"1","title":"2","params":[{"extensionParam":"{\"expression\":\"var a=new org.springframework.expression.CODE
Verbosity Indicators9 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW⚡plugins/services/cassandra.go102 // Step 1: STARTUP (CQL_VERSION=3.0.0)COMMENT
LOW⚡plugins/services/cassandra.go109 // Step 2: 读取响应COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/cassandra.go123 // Step 3: 如果需要认证COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/cassandra.go149 // Step 4: 发送测试查询COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/mongodb.go103 // Step 1: isMaster 获取服务参数COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/mongodb.go115 // Step 2: saslStart SCRAM-SHA-1COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/kafka.go85 // Step 1: ApiVersions 握手 (api_key=18, api_version=0)COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/kafka.go96 // Step 2: SASL/PLAIN 认证 (如果需要)COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/kafka.go137 // Step 3: Metadata 请求验证连接 (api_key=3, api_version=0)COMMENT
Structural Annotation Overuse9 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW⚡plugins/services/cassandra.go102 // Step 1: STARTUP (CQL_VERSION=3.0.0)COMMENT
LOW⚡plugins/services/cassandra.go109 // Step 2: 读取响应COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/cassandra.go123 // Step 3: 如果需要认证COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/cassandra.go149 // Step 4: 发送测试查询COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/mongodb.go103 // Step 1: isMaster 获取服务参数COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/mongodb.go115 // Step 2: saslStart SCRAM-SHA-1COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/kafka.go85 // Step 1: ApiVersions 握手 (api_key=18, api_version=0)COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/kafka.go96 // Step 2: SASL/PLAIN 认证 (如果需要)COMMENT
LOWplugins/services/kafka.go137 // Step 3: Metadata 请求验证连接 (api_key=3, api_version=0)COMMENT
Over-Commented Block8 hits · 8 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWcore/adaptive_pool.go21 HealthCongested // 明确拥塞，大幅降速COMMENT
LOWlibs/grdp/protocol/pdu/data.go321 core.WriteUInt16LE(c.NumberCapabilities, buff)COMMENT
LOWlibs/grdp/protocol/x224/x224.go321 x.Emit("reconnect", PROTOCOL_HYBRID)COMMENT
LOWcommon/proxy/manager_test.go421 t.Logf("✓ Stats 反映配置信息")COMMENT
LOWcommon/proxy/manager_test.go441// done := make(chan bool)COMMENT
LOWcommon/proxy/manager_test.go461// }COMMENT
LOWcommon/config/constants.go21 // 注意：9100 已移除，该端口为打印机 RAW 端口，发送数据会触发打印 (Issue #517)COMMENT
LOWpkg/fscan/doc.go1// Package fscan exposes fscan as an embeddable scanner library.COMMENT
Cross-Language Confusion (JS/TS)1 hit · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHfscan-lab/docker/services/core/mongo/init.js21print('MongoDB initialized with final flag');CODE
Unused Imports3 hits · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtools/perftest/plot_results.py23CODE
LOWtools/perftest/plot_results.py24CODE
LOWfscan-lab/test-services/Weblogic/create-domain.py1CODE
Fake / Example Data2 hits · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWplugins/services/smtp.go122 if err := client.Mail("test@test.com"); err != nil {CODE
LOWwebscan/pocs/nexus-cve-2020-10204.yml11 {"action":"coreui_User","method":"update","data":[{"userId":"anonymous","version":"1","firstName":"Anonymous","lasCODE
Deep Nesting1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtools/perftest/plot_benchmarks.py17CODE