Repository Analysis

public-apis/public-apis

A collective list of free APIs

12.0 Low AI signal View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of public-apis/public-apis, a Python project with 449,911 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 3,637 lines of code across 16 source files, recording 42 pattern matches distributed across 6 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 12.0 places this repository in the Low AI signal band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

12.0
Adjusted Score
12.0
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-13
Last Push
449.9K
Stars
Python
Language
3.6K
Lines of Code
16
Files
42
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.06
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 1MEDIUM 1LOW 40

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 42 distinct pattern matches across 6 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers31 hits · 28 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/validate/links.py95def has_cloudflare_protection(resp: Response) -> bool:CODE
LOWscripts/validate/links.py201def check_if_list_of_links_are_working(list_of_links: List[str]) -> List[str]:CODE
LOWscripts/validate/links.py212def start_duplicate_links_checker(links: List[str]) -> None:CODE
LOWscripts/validate/links.py229def start_links_working_checker(links: List[str]) -> None:CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py19 def test_error_message_return_and_return_type(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py42 def test_if_get_categories_content_return_correct_data_of_categories(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py71 def test_if_check_alphabetical_order_return_correct_msg_error(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py120 def test_check_title_with_correct_title(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py129 def test_check_title_with_markdown_syntax_incorrect(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py142 def test_check_title_with_api_at_the_end_of_the_title(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py155 def test_check_description_with_correct_description(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py164 def test_check_description_with_first_char_is_not_capitalized(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py178 def test_check_description_with_punctuation_in_the_end(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py197 def test_check_description_that_exceeds_the_character_limit(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py212 def test_check_auth_with_valid_auth(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py223 def test_check_auth_without_backtick(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py238 def test_check_auth_with_invalid_auth(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py271 def test_check_https_with_valid_https(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py279 def test_check_https_with_invalid_https(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py294 def test_check_cors_with_valid_cors(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py302 def test_check_cors_with_invalid_cors(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py317 def test_check_entry_with_correct_segments(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py326 def test_check_entry_with_incorrect_segments(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py347 def test_check_file_format_with_correct_format(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py374 def test_check_file_format_with_category_header_not_added_to_index(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py394 def test_check_file_format_with_category_without_min_entries(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_format.py424 def test_check_file_format_entry_without_all_necessary_columns(self):CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py74 def test_find_link_in_text_with_invalid_argument(self):STRING
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py80 def test_if_check_duplicate_links_has_the_correct_return(self):STRING
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py99 def test_if_fake_user_agent_has_a_str_as_return(self):STRING
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py147 def test_has_cloudflare_protection_when_there_is_no_protection(self):STRING
Fake / Example Data6 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWREADME.md580| [Hipsum](https://hipsum.co) | Hipster-themed lorem ipsum generator for placeholder text | No | Yes | Unknown |CODE
LOWREADME.md1784| [Bacon Ipsum](https://baconipsum.com/json-api/) | A Meatier Lorem Ipsum Generator | No | Yes | Unknown |CODE
LOWREADME.md1794| [Loripsum](http://loripsum.net/) | The "lorem ipsum" generator that doesn't suck | No | No | Unknown |CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py42 self.text_without_cloudflare_flags = 'Lorem Ipsum'CODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py53 lorem ipsum https://www.example.com?param1=1&param2=2#anchorCODE
LOWscripts/tests/test_validate_links.py54 https://www.example.com?param1=1&param2=2#anchor lorem ipsumCODE
Synthetic Comment Markers1 hit · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHREADME.md759| [Anycrap](https://anycrap.shop/developers) | 35,000+ absurdist AI-generated product concepts with names, descriptions,CODE
Modern AI Meta-Vocabulary1 hit · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMREADME.md1311| [Not Human Search](https://nothumansearch.ai/openapi.yaml) | AI tool discovery with agentic scoring for 8,600+ tools aCODE
Unused Imports2 hits · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/validate/__init__.py3CODE
LOWscripts/validate/__init__.py4CODE
Deep Nesting1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/validate/format.py192CODE