Repository Analysis

palera1n/palera1n

Jailbreak for A8 through A11, T2 devices, on iOS/iPadOS/tvOS 15.0, bridgeOS 5.0 and higher.

9.9 Low AI signal View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of palera1n/palera1n, a C project with 6,354 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 11,085 lines of code across 41 source files, recording 163 pattern matches distributed across 1 syntactic category. The overall adjusted score of 9.9 places this repository in the Low AI signal band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

9.9
Adjusted Score
9.9
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-12
Last Push
6.4K
Stars
C
Language
11.1K
Lines of Code
41
Files
163
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 0LOW 163

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 163 distinct pattern matches across 1 syntactic category. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Over-Commented Block163 hits · 110 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWinclude/palerain.h1#ifndef PALERAIN_HCOMMENT
LOWinclude/palerain.h21#define palerain_option_version 129COMMENT
LOWinclude/palerain.h41typedef struct stuffCOMMENT
LOWinclude/paleinfo.h21// (UINT64_C(1) << 3) /* Deprecated and removed */COMMENT
LOWinclude/paleinfo.h41#define palerain_option_overlay (UINT64_C(1) << 23) /* there is an overlay (should always be true) */COMMENT
LOWinclude/tui.h1#ifndef TUI_HCOMMENT
LOWinclude/tui.h21COMMENT
LOWinclude/tui.h41#define BG_YELLOW 43COMMENT
LOWinclude/ANSI-color-codes.h1/*COMMENT
LOWinclude/ANSI-color-codes.h21#define BBLK "\033[1;30m"COMMENT
LOWinclude/ANSI-color-codes.h41#define BLKB "\033[40m"COMMENT
LOWinclude/ANSI-color-codes.h61#define HBLK "\033[0;90m"COMMENT
LOWinclude/ANSI-color-codes.h81#define reset "\033[0m"COMMENT
LOWsrc/log.c1#include <time.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/tui_screen_jailbreak.c1#ifdef TUICOMMENT
LOWsrc/lock_vars.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/exec_checkra1n.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/credits.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/devhelper.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/devhelper.c21#include <inttypes.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/tui_screen_main.c1#ifdef TUICOMMENT
LOWsrc/usb_iokit.c21 * AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHERCOMMENT
LOWsrc/tui_main.c1#ifdef TUICOMMENT
LOWsrc/tui_screen_enter_recovery.c1#ifdef TUICOMMENT
LOWsrc/tui_screen_enter_dfu.c1#ifdef TUICOMMENT
LOWsrc/tui_screen_options.c1#ifdef TUICOMMENT
LOWsrc/override_file.c1#include <palerain.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/main.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/dfuhelper.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/dfuhelper.c21#include <libimobiledevice/lockdown.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/pongo_helper.c1#include <errno.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/usb_libusb.c21 * AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHERCOMMENT
LOWsrc/optparse.c1#include <stdio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h81#define ELFMAG3 'F'COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h101COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h121#define EI_PAD 9COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h141#define EM_386 3COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h161#define EM_ARM 40COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h181#define EM_ST100 60COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h201#define EM_HUANY 81COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h221#define EM_SNP1K 99COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h241#define EM_CE 119COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h261#define EM_QDSP6 164COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h281#define EM_STM8 186COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h301#define EM_KMX32 211COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h361#define SHN_HIPROC 0xff1fCOMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h381#define SHT_SHLIB 10COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h401#define SHT_HISUNW 0x6fffffffCOMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h481#define SYMINFO_FLG_COPY 0x0004COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h501#define STB_GNU_UNIQUE 10COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h601#define PT_NUM 8COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h621#define PF_R (1 << 2)COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h641#define NT_LWPSTATUS 16COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h661#define NT_PPC_TM_CPPR 0x10eCOMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h681#define NT_ARM_TLS 0x401COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h721#define DT_NULL 0COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h741#define DT_PLTREL 20COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h761#define DT_PROCNUM DT_MIPS_NUMCOMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h781#define DT_GNU_HASH 0x6ffffef5COMMENT
LOWsrc/tools/counterfeit_elf.h801#define DT_RELCOUNT 0x6ffffffaCOMMENT
103 more matches not shown…