Repository Analysis

openscopeproject/InteractiveHtmlBom

Interactive HTML BOM generation plugin for KiCad, EasyEDA, Eagle, Fusion360 and Allegro PCB designer

2.7 Likely human-written View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of openscopeproject/InteractiveHtmlBom, a Python project with 4,473 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 23,295 lines of code across 49 source files, recording 60 pattern matches distributed across 8 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 2.7 places this repository in the Likely human-written band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

2.7
Adjusted Score
2.7
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-12
Last Push
4.5K
Stars
Python
Language
23.3K
Lines of Code
49
Files
60
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

Longitudinal tracking requires multiple scan runs. Once this repository is re-scanned after new commits land, this chart will visualise how the synthetic code signal evolves over time — enabling you to detect whether AI authorship is growing, stabilising, or being actively corrected by human engineers.

No multi-scan history yet — run the scanner again to build trend data.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 1LOW 59

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 60 distinct pattern matches across 8 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Deep Nesting22 hits · 22 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/lzstring.py20CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py92CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py215CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/svgpath.py356CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py269CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py375CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py397CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py436CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py592CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py674CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py794CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/easyeda.py317CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/easyeda.py443CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/genericjson.py75CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py154CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py218CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py275CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py330CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py477CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py685CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad_extra/sexpressions.py13CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad_extra/netlistparser.py8CODE
Unused Imports14 hits · 14 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW__init__.py1CODE
LOWmake_release.py20CODE
LOWtests/test_module.py2CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/generate_interactive_bom.py2CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/config.py3CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py1CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py12CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py13CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py13CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/dialog/__init__.py1CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/dialog/__init__.py1CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/svgpath.py11CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/svgpath.py11CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/svgpath.py11CODE
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers12 hits · 13 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWmake_release.py47def read_last_tag_from_version_file(path: Path) -> str | None:CODE
LOWmake_release.py62def copy_interactive_html_bom(src: Path, dst: Path) -> None:CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/table-util.js259function getBoundingClientRectFromMultiple(elements) {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/table-util.js279function cloneElementWithDimensions(elem) {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/render.js684function pointWithinDistanceToSegment(x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2, d) {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/ibom.js253function clearHighlightedFootprints() {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/ibom.js262function createRowHighlightHandler(rowid, refs, net) {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/ibom.js394function checkboxSetUnsetAllHandler(checkboxname) {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/ibom.js1145function populateMarkWhenCheckedOptions() {CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad.py78 def parse_extra_data_from_pcb(self):CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/fusion_eagle.py275 def _calculate_footprint_bbox(self, package, x, y, angle, mirrored):CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad_extra/__init__.py31def find_latest_schematic_data(base_name, directories):CODE
Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping6 hits · 7 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWmake_release.py156 except Exception as e:CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/version.py23 except Exception:CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/units.py21except Exception:CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/ibom.py224 except Exception as e:CODE
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/dialog/settings_dialog.py336 except Exception as e:CODE
MEDIUMInteractiveHtmlBom/dialog/settings_dialog.py46def SetSizeHints(self, sz1, sz2):CODE
Over-Commented Block3 hits · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/core/config.py521 ini.read(file)COMMENT
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/ibom.html21///////////////////////////////////////////////COMMENT
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/lz-string.js1// Copyright (c) 2013 Pieroxy <pieroxy@pieroxy.net>COMMENT
Modern Structural Boilerplate1 hit · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWmake_release.py53def update_metadata_version(metadata_path: Path, version: str) -> None:CODE
AI Slop Vocabulary1 hit · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/ecad/kicad_extra/__init__.py47 # if no such file is found just return last modifiedCOMMENT
Fake / Example Data1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWInteractiveHtmlBom/web/table-util.js233 newElem.classList.add("placeholder");CODE