AI Slop Code RIsk Monitor

nginx-proxy/acme-companion

Automated ACME SSL certificate generation for nginx-proxy

11.8 Moderate pattern signal View on GitHub

Maintenance and Governance Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for nginx-proxy/acme-companion, a Shell project with 7,724 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 7,312 lines of code across 74 source files, recording 54 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 11.8 (Moderate pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

11.8
Adjusted Signal
11.8
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-07
Last Push
7.7K
Stars
Shell
Language
7.3K
Lines of Code
74
Files
54
Pattern Hits
2026-10-12
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · v3

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 44.5/100 · MEDIUM

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 54 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 0 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 37.2/100 · MEDIUM

Which changes need focused human review? 54 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 7LOW 47

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 54 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Redundant / Tautological Comments26 hits · 39 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWapp/functions.sh180 # Check if a certificate ($1) is still valid for a given amount of time in seconds ($2).COMMENT
LOWapp/functions.sh376 # Check if this user exist inside the containerCOMMENT
LOWapp/functions.sh389 # Check if this group exist inside the containerCOMMENT
LOWapp/letsencrypt_service.sh117 # Add domain to the array storing currently enabled domains.COMMENT
LOWapp/entrypoint.sh112 # Check if the DH params file is user provided or comes from acme-companionCOMMENT
LOWapp/entrypoint.sh121 # Check if /etc/nginx/certs/dhparam.pem matches the expected pre-generated DH groupCOMMENT
LOWapp/entrypoint.sh152 # Check if the existing default certificate is still valid for moreCOMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh318# Check if output should be considered "no output"COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/container_restart/run.sh49 # Check if container restartedCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/symlinks/run.sh61# Check if ${domains[2]} symlink is still thereCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/symlinks/run.sh88# Check if the symlinks are correctly removedCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/symlinks/run.sh112# Check if the custom certificate is still thereCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/symlinks/run.sh116# Check if the default certificate is still thereCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/certs_standalone/run.sh71# Check if the domain is on the certificate.COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/certs_standalone/run.sh107 # Check if the domain is on the certificate.COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/ocsp_must_staple/run.sh37# Check if the OCSP Must-Staple extension is present in the ${domains[0]} certificateCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/ocsp_must_staple/run.sh47# Check if the OCSP Must-Staple extension is absent from the ${domains[1]} certificateCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/certs_single_domain/run.sh68 # Check if the domain is on the certificate.COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/certs_single/run.sh49 # Check if the domain is on the certificate.COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/certs_san/run.sh64 # Check if the domain is on the certificate.COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/acme_hooks/run.sh58# Check if the default command is deliverd properly in /etc/acme.shCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/acme_hooks/run.sh81# Check if the default action is performedCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/acme_hooks/run.sh92# Check if the per-container command is deliverd properly in /etc/acme.shCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/acme_hooks/run.sh113# Check if the percontainer action is performedCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/location_config/run.sh40# Check if the ACME location configuration was correctly applied (ie only once) to the target fileCOMMENT
LOWtest/tests/certs_default_renew_deprecated/run.sh59# Check if the default command is delivered properly in /etc/acme.shCOMMENT
Self-Referential Comments7 hits · 21 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMapp/letsencrypt_service.sh91 # Create an array containing domains for which a symlinked certificateCOMMENT
MEDIUMapp/letsencrypt_service.sh102 # Create an array containing domains that are consideredCOMMENT
MEDIUMapp/letsencrypt_service.sh123 # Create an array containing only domains for which a symlinked private key existsCOMMENT
MEDIUMapp/install_scripts.sh24 ## Create a symlink without the .sh extension in /app for backwards compatibility with the older docs.COMMENT
MEDIUMapp/entrypoint.sh159 # Create a default cert and private key if:COMMENT
MEDIUMtest/run.sh4# This file is adapted from the Docker official images test suiteCOMMENT
MEDIUMtest/tests/symlinks/run.sh43# Create a fake le4.wtf custom certificate and keyCOMMENT
Structural Annotation Overuse10 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWREADME.md66### Step 1 - nginx-proxyCOMMENT
LOWREADME.md83### Step 2 - acme-companionCOMMENT
LOWREADME.md101### Step 3 - proxied container(s)COMMENT
LOWdocs/Basic-usage.md14### Step 1 - nginx-proxyCOMMENT
LOWdocs/Basic-usage.md31### Step 2 - acme-companionCOMMENT
LOWdocs/Basic-usage.md49### Step 3 - proxied container(s)COMMENT
LOWdocs/Advanced-usage.md19### Step 1 - nginxCOMMENT
LOWdocs/Advanced-usage.md34### Step 2 - docker-genCOMMENT
LOWdocs/Advanced-usage.md51### Step 3 - acme-companionCOMMENT
LOWdocs/Advanced-usage.md66### Step 4 - proxied container(s)COMMENT
Over-Commented Block11 hits · 11 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtest/run.sh1#!/usr/bin/env bashCOMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh21#COMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh41#COMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh61# means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sentCOMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh81# this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,COMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh101# (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work orCOMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh121# within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if andCOMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh141# Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modifyCOMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh161# whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,COMMENT
LOWtest/run.sh181# of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.COMMENT
LOWtest/tests/docker_api_tls/run.sh1#!/bin/bashCOMMENT