The utility-first workflow you love from Tailwind CSS in your React Native applications.
This report summarizes scanner evidence for nativewind/nativewind, a JavaScript project with 8,109 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 6,205 lines of code across 91 source files, recording 48 pattern matches distributed across 8 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 13.5 (Moderate pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.
Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.
Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.
Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 35 finding(s).
Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).
Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 29 finding(s).
Which changes need focused human review? 48 finding(s).
This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.
Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.
This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.
The scanner identified 48 distinct pattern matches across 8 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.
Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 51 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 53 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 71 | # ------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 79 | # ------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 296 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 298 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 558 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 560 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 731 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 733 | # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 35 | def test_engine_peer_must_be_exact(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 42 | def test_both_candidate_tags_must_be_visible(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 50 | def test_only_exact_rc_versions_are_accepted(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 56 | def test_reviewed_archive_passes(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 60 | def test_changed_archive_is_rejected_before_publication(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 66 | def test_mismatched_integrity_is_rejected(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 72 | def test_different_package_or_version_is_rejected(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 79 | def test_local_dependencies_are_rejected(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 87 | def test_retry_accepts_identical_registry_bytes(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 93 | def test_registry_collision_is_rejected(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 100 | def test_rc_tag_can_advance_without_changing_latest(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 103 | def test_stable_tag_change_is_rejected(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 115 | def test_missing_version_retry_is_bounded(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 124 | def test_authentication_errors_are_not_retried_as_propagation(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 132 | def test_rc_tag_can_become_visible_after_stale_response(self): | CODE |
| LOW⚡ | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 140 | def test_rc_polling_never_accepts_a_stable_tag_change(self): | CODE |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 20 | ## Step 0: Parse the issue reference | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 28 | ## Step 1: Read the issue | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 40 | ## Step 2: Determine repo and version context | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 77 | ## Step 3: Assess reproducibility | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 98 | ## Step 4: Create a reproduction | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 210 | ## Step 5: Verify against versions | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 243 | ## Step 6: Draft a comment | COMMENT |
| LOW | .claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md | 263 | ## Step 7: Clean up | COMMENT |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | lefthook.yml | 1 | # EXAMPLE USAGE: | COMMENT |
| LOW | lefthook.yml | 21 | # parallel: true | COMMENT |
| LOW | lefthook.yml | 41 | # - script: "hello.go" | COMMENT |
| LOW | example/ios/example/example-Bridging-Header.h | 1 | // | COMMENT |
| LOW | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 1 | name: Issue Reproduction | COMMENT |
| LOW | .github/workflows/ci.yml | 101 | COMMENT | |
| LOW | .github/workflows/ci.yml | 121 | # tar -xzf ios-dev-build.tar.gz | COMMENT |
| LOW | .github/workflows/ci.yml | 141 | # exit 1 | COMMENT |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDIUM | .github/workflows/issue-repro.yml | 249 | // --- scaffold flavor inference --------------------------------- | COMMENT |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | .github/scripts/judge-repro.py | 30 | except Exception: | CODE |
| LOW | .github/scripts/judge-repro.py | 45 | except Exception: | CODE |
| LOW | .github/scripts/judge-repro.py | 74 | except Exception: | CODE |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDIUM | .github/actions/ios-dev-app/action.yml | 97 | # Create a tar for better caching (go back to example directory) | COMMENT |
| Severity | File | Line | Snippet | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | .github/scripts/test_release_rc.py | 79 | CODE |