AI Slop Code RIsk Monitor

nativewind/nativewind

The utility-first workflow you love from Tailwind CSS in your React Native applications.

13.5 Moderate pattern signal View on GitHub

Maintenance and Governance Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for nativewind/nativewind, a JavaScript project with 8,109 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 6,205 lines of code across 91 source files, recording 48 pattern matches distributed across 8 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 13.5 (Moderate pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

13.5
Adjusted Signal
13.5
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-09-15
Last Push
8.1K
Stars
JavaScript
Language
6.2K
Lines of Code
91
Files
48
Pattern Hits
2026-10-12
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · v3

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 33.7/100 · MEDIUM

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 35 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 36.8/100 · MEDIUM

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 29 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 44.0/100 · MEDIUM

Which changes need focused human review? 48 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 12LOW 36

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 48 distinct pattern matches across 8 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Decorative Section Separators10 hits · 30 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml51 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml53 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml71 # -------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml79 # -------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml296 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml298 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml558 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml560 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml731 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml733 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------COMMENT
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers16 hits · 24 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py35 def test_engine_peer_must_be_exact(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py42 def test_both_candidate_tags_must_be_visible(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py50 def test_only_exact_rc_versions_are_accepted(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py56 def test_reviewed_archive_passes(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py60 def test_changed_archive_is_rejected_before_publication(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py66 def test_mismatched_integrity_is_rejected(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py72 def test_different_package_or_version_is_rejected(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py79 def test_local_dependencies_are_rejected(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py87 def test_retry_accepts_identical_registry_bytes(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py93 def test_registry_collision_is_rejected(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py100 def test_rc_tag_can_advance_without_changing_latest(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py103 def test_stable_tag_change_is_rejected(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py115 def test_missing_version_retry_is_bounded(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py124 def test_authentication_errors_are_not_retried_as_propagation(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py132 def test_rc_tag_can_become_visible_after_stale_response(self):CODE
LOW⚡.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py140 def test_rc_polling_never_accepts_a_stable_tag_change(self):CODE
Structural Annotation Overuse8 hits · 12 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md20## Step 0: Parse the issue referenceCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md28## Step 1: Read the issueCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md40## Step 2: Determine repo and version contextCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md77## Step 3: Assess reproducibilityCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md98## Step 4: Create a reproductionCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md210## Step 5: Verify against versionsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md243## Step 6: Draft a commentCOMMENT
LOW.claude/skills/triage/SKILL.md263## Step 7: Clean upCOMMENT
Over-Commented Block8 hits · 8 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWlefthook.yml1# EXAMPLE USAGE:COMMENT
LOWlefthook.yml21# parallel: trueCOMMENT
LOWlefthook.yml41# - script: "hello.go"COMMENT
LOWexample/ios/example/example-Bridging-Header.h1//COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml1name: Issue ReproductionCOMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/ci.yml101COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/ci.yml121 # tar -xzf ios-dev-build.tar.gzCOMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/ci.yml141 # exit 1COMMENT
Modern AI Meta-Vocabulary1 hit · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM.github/workflows/issue-repro.yml249 // --- scaffold flavor inference ---------------------------------COMMENT
Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping3 hits · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.github/scripts/judge-repro.py30 except Exception:CODE
LOW.github/scripts/judge-repro.py45 except Exception:CODE
LOW.github/scripts/judge-repro.py74 except Exception:CODE
Self-Referential Comments1 hit · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM.github/actions/ios-dev-app/action.yml97 # Create a tar for better caching (go back to example directory)COMMENT
Deep Nesting1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.github/scripts/test_release_rc.py79CODE