AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

kunchenguid/gnhf

SlopCodeMonitor badge for kunchenguid/gnhf Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).
2.6 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for kunchenguid/gnhf. SynthScan examined 41,529 lines of code across 110 source files, recording 65 pattern matches distributed across 5 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 2.6 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

2.6
Adjusted Signal
2.6
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
—
Last Push
—
Stars
—
Language
41.5K
Lines of Code
110
Files
65
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 7.1/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 50 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 9.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 47 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 10.8/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 65 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 15LOW 50

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 65 distinct pattern matches across 5 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Decorative Section Separators15 hits · 45 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMsrc/renderer-diff.ts3// ── Cell types ───────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer-diff.ts20// ── Cell helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer-diff.ts48// ── Cell → string conversion ────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer-diff.ts67// ── Frame diffing ────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer-diff.ts88// ── Diff → ANSI output ──────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/mock-orchestrator.ts131// ── Randomization helpers ────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/mock-orchestrator.ts137// ── Mock orchestrator ────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts25// ── Constants ────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts49// ── ANSI helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts56// ── Cell-based render functions ──────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts265// ── String wrappers (preserve existing API) ──────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts315// ── Star rendering (cell-based) ─────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts514// ── Build full frame (cell-based) ────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts726// ── String wrappers for frame building ───────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/renderer.ts765// ── Renderer class ───────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers32 hits · 34 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/release-ci-exclusions.test.ts101function pullRequestFilterCoverage(pr: unknown): PullRequestFilter {CODE
LOWsrc/cli.ts282function initializeCurrentBranchRun(CODE
LOWsrc/cli.ts535function persistStdinPromptForReexec(prompt: string): {CODE
LOWsrc/cli.ts552function isTrustedReexecPromptPath(promptPath: string): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/cli.ts562function cleanupTrustedReexecPromptPath(promptPath: string): void {CODE
LOWsrc/cli.test.ts508async function runCliResumeWithActualRun(CODE
LOWsrc/core/commit-message-config.ts4export function normalizeCommitMessageConfig(CODE
LOWsrc/core/commit-message.ts55export function getCommitMessageSchemaFields(CODE
LOWsrc/core/commit-message.ts65export function getCommitMessagePromptFields(CODE
LOWsrc/core/sleep.test.ts49function createWindowsChildProcess(pid = 1234): ChildProcess {CODE
LOWsrc/core/sleep.ts116function isTrustedLinuxReexecReadyPath(readyPath: string): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/core/sleep.ts196function forwardTerminationSignalsToChild(CODE
LOWsrc/core/telemetry.ts82export function getBuildTimeUmamiWebsiteID(): string {CODE
LOWsrc/core/telemetry.ts275export function resetDefaultTelemetryForTests(): void {CODE
LOWsrc/core/config.ts35function hasDisallowedAcpTargetChar(target: string): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/core/config.ts263function normalizeAgentPathOverride(CODE
LOWsrc/core/config.ts341function normalizeAgentArgsOverride(CODE
LOWsrc/core/config.ts422function normalizeAcpRegistryOverrides(CODE
LOWsrc/core/config.ts570function serializeAgentPathOverride(CODE
LOWsrc/core/config.ts592function serializeAgentArgsOverride(CODE
LOW⚡src/core/run.ts101function commitMessageMetadataValue(CODE
LOW⚡src/core/run.ts107function readCommitMessageMetadata(CODE
LOW⚡src/core/run.ts116function inferCommitMessageFromSchema(CODE
LOWsrc/core/run.ts164function writeCommitMessageMetadata(CODE
LOWsrc/core/run.ts360export function getCompletedIterationCount(runInfo: RunInfo): number {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/cursor.ts202function userSpecifiedPermissionMode(userArgs: string[]): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/acp.ts64function redactRawAcpTargetInString(text: string, target: string): string {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/acp.ts70function redactRawAcpTargetInValue(value: unknown, target: string): unknown {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/opencode.ts123function buildProviderErrorMessage(error: OpenCodeStreamErrorInfo): string {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/opencode.ts190function buildStructuredOutputFormat(schema: AgentOutputSchema) {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/copilot.ts91function userSpecifiedPermissionMode(userArgs: string[]): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/core/agents/stream-utils.ts141export function setupChildProcessHandlers(CODE
Over-Commented Block10 hits · 10 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWREADME.md241# agentPathOverride:COMMENT
LOWREADME.md261# - --providerCOMMENT
LOWREADME.md281# local or beta build of an ACP agent.COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/no-mistakes-required.yml41 check:COMMENT
LOWsrc/core/bootstrap-config.golden.yml1# Agent to use by default: native agent name or acp:<target-or-command>COMMENT
LOWsrc/core/bootstrap-config.golden.yml21# - -cCOMMENT
LOWsrc/core/bootstrap-config.golden.yml41# agentModel:COMMENT
LOWsrc/core/agents/acp.ts241 const iterationStartUsed = this.lastReportedUsed;COMMENT
LOWsrc/core/agents/acp.ts261 // the turn, so this is the primary candidate to JSON.parse - separatingCOMMENT
LOWsrc/core/agents/acp.ts321 // Count both output and thought streams toward output tokens -COMMENT
Verbosity Indicators4 hits · 9 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh56# Step 1: Run Prettier auto-fix on changed filesCOMMENT
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh62# Step 2: Run ESLint auto-fix on changed TS/JS filesCOMMENT
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh68# Step 3: Run Prettier check mode to verifyCOMMENT
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh77# Step 4: Run ESLint check mode to verifyCOMMENT
Structural Annotation Overuse4 hits · 9 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh56# Step 1: Run Prettier auto-fix on changed filesCOMMENT
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh62# Step 2: Run ESLint auto-fix on changed TS/JS filesCOMMENT
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh68# Step 3: Run Prettier check mode to verifyCOMMENT
LOW⚡.airlock/lint.sh77# Step 4: Run ESLint check mode to verifyCOMMENT