AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

kangarooking/cangjie-skill

SlopCodeMonitor badge for kangarooking/cangjie-skill Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

把书、长视频、播客等高价值内容蒸馏成可执行的 Agent Skills(Distill high-value content from books, long-form videos, podcasts, and more into executable Agent Skills)

1.6 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for kangarooking/cangjie-skill, a Python project with 11,946 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 34,991 lines of code across 287 source files, recording 49 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 1.6 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

1.6
Adjusted Signal
1.6
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-02
Last Push
11.9K
Stars
Python
Language
35.0K
Lines of Code
287
Files
49
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 5.3/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 30 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 2.7/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 19 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 4.7/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 25 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 6.8/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 49 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 0LOW 49

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 49 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers25 hits · 34 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/test_compile_resources.py45 def test_legacy_without_resources_is_unchanged(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_compile_resources.py51 def test_single_and_pack_carry_same_declared_resources(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_compile_resources.py65 def test_invalid_resource_paths_fail_closed(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_compile_resources.py72 def test_cli_compile_with_resources_validates_and_preserves_bytes(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_compile_resources.py91 def test_missing_directory_symlink_and_binary_rejected(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_quality_contracts.py21 def test_output_example_schema_and_runtime_contract(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_quality_contracts.py25 def test_numeric_expected_type_and_tolerance_are_checked(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_quality_contracts.py32 def test_synthetic_output_oracles(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_quality_contracts.py45 def test_resource_schema_rejects_escape_and_accepts_declared_text(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py38 def test_missing_output_counts_in_denominator_and_is_incomplete(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py45 def test_complete_legacy_layout_passes(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py52 def test_failed_assertion_returns_one(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py57 def test_all_missing_does_not_look_successful(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py62 def test_missing_mapping_is_invalid(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py67 def test_inconsistent_variants_are_invalid(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py72 def test_duplicate_variant_is_invalid(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py77 def test_duplicate_case_id_is_invalid(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py82 def test_no_cases_or_no_assertions_is_invalid(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py89 def test_variant_artifacts_are_isolated(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py105 def test_prepare_uses_isolated_directories(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py115 def test_legacy_json_with_prose_and_ambiguous_json(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py122 def test_score_cli_incomplete_exit_code(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/test_output_evals.py131 def test_json_numeric_and_exact_assertions(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_output_evals.py144 def test_nonfinite_or_invalid_numeric_config_is_rejected(self):CODE
LOWtests/test_output_evals.py152 def test_file_assertion_cannot_escape_variant(self):CODE
Unused Imports19 hits · 19 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/generate_star_history.py4CODE
LOWscripts/build_index.py11CODE
LOWscripts/count_tokens.py17CODE
LOWscripts/benchmark.py12CODE
LOWscripts/apply_skill_patch.py12CODE
LOWscripts/select_output_strategy.py13CODE
LOWscripts/repair_flow.py9CODE
LOWscripts/cangjie_common.py8CODE
LOWscripts/build_chunks.py14CODE
LOWscripts/impact_analysis.py20CODE
LOWscripts/compile_single.py21CODE
LOWscripts/run_output_evals.py18CODE
LOWscripts/compile_pack.py23CODE
LOWscripts/compile_pack.py30CODE
LOWscripts/run_trigger_evals.py20CODE
LOWscripts/update_flow.py9CODE
LOWscripts/cangjie.py18CODE
LOWscripts/diff_sources.py17CODE
LOWscripts/validate_skill_pack.py15CODE
Deep Nesting4 hits · 4 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/select_output_strategy.py33CODE
LOWscripts/impact_analysis.py31CODE
LOWscripts/impact_analysis.py90CODE
LOWscripts/run_trigger_evals.py80CODE
Over-Commented Block1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWwebsite/src/env.d.ts1/// <reference path="../.astro/types.d.ts" />COMMENT