AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

joyce677/TrendRadar

Name: joyce677/TrendRadar — HTML Code Quality & Security Review | AI Slop Code Risk Monitor
Creator: AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

一键监控今日头条、百度热搜、微博、抖音、知乎、B站等35个平台，智能关键词筛选，自动生成热点分析报告。支持企业微信、飞书、钉钉、Telegram推送，30秒网页部署，1分钟手机通知，无需编程基础。还有文字和图片版api可调用

0.0 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for joyce677/TrendRadar, a HTML project with 1,903 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 6,610,816 lines of code across 13652 source files, recording 57 pattern matches distributed across 5 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 0.0 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

0.0

Adjusted Signal

0.0

Raw Pattern Score

100%

Time Factor

2026-10-20

Last Push

1.9K

Stars

HTML

Language

6.6M

Lines of Code

13.7K

Files

Pattern Hits

2026-10-31

Scan Date

0.00

HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 27 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 37 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 0.1/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 57 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal: Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score: Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor: A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits: Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate: High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files: Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 1MEDIUM 1LOW 55

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 57 distinct pattern matches across 5 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping28 hits · 28 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
MEDIUM	main.py	244	def parse_version(version_str):	CODE
LOW⚡	main.py	3019	except Exception:	CODE
LOW	main.py	176	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	259	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	322	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	336	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	355	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	419	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	472	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	656	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	2776	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	2821	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	2880	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	2952	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3051	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3118	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3475	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3636	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3686	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	21	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	36	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	117	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	139	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	226	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	303	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	368	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	392	except Exception as e:	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	464	except Exception as e:	STRING

Deep Nesting20 hits · 12 pts

Severity	File	Line	Context
LOW	main.py	488	CODE
LOW	main.py	538	CODE
LOW	main.py	592	CODE
LOW	main.py	662	CODE
LOW	main.py	706	CODE
LOW	main.py	779	CODE
LOW	main.py	925	CODE
LOW	main.py	965	CODE
LOW	main.py	1276	CODE
LOW	main.py	1373	CODE
LOW	main.py	1547	CODE
LOW	main.py	2229	CODE
LOW	main.py	2322	CODE
LOW	main.py	2826	CODE
LOW	main.py	2888	CODE
LOW	main.py	432	CODE
LOW	main.py	3181	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	40	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	121	CODE
LOW	docker/manage.py	309	CODE

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers7 hits · 6 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW⚡	main.py	3009	def _detect_docker_environment(self) -> bool:	CODE
LOW	main.py	1373	def format_title_for_platform(	CODE
LOW	main.py	2322	def split_content_into_batches(	CODE
LOW	main.py	3122	def _prepare_current_title_info(self, results: Dict, time_info: str) -> Dict:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3181	def _send_notification_if_needed(	CODE
LOW	main.py	3300	def _initialize_and_check_config(self) -> None:	CODE
LOW	main.py	3568	def generate_static_api_files(analyzer: "NewsAnalyzer"):	CODE

Empty Error Handlers1 hit · 5 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
HIGH	docker/manage.py	184	except:	CODE

Modern Structural Boilerplate1 hit · 2 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW⚡	main.py	3026	def _setup_proxy(self) -> None:	CODE