Repository Analysis

gojue/ecapture

Capturing SSL/TLS plaintext without a CA certificate using eBPF. Supported on Linux/Android kernels for amd64/arm64.

9.8 Low AI signal View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of gojue/ecapture, a C project with 15,352 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 62,330 lines of code across 333 source files, recording 486 pattern matches distributed across 6 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 9.8 places this repository in the Low AI signal band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

9.8
Adjusted Score
9.8
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-12
Last Push
15.4K
Stars
C
Language
62.3K
Lines of Code
333
Files
486
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 27LOW 459

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 486 distinct pattern matches across 6 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Over-Commented Block357 hits · 349 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.golangci.yml1# This configuration file is not a recommendation.COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_na_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_BORINGSSL_NA_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_na_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_na_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x10COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_na_kern.c61// bssl::SSL_HANDSHAKE->hintsCOMMENT
LOWkern/gnutls_3_7_0_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_GNUTLS_3_7_0_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/gnutls_3_7_0_kern.c21// gnutls_session_int->key.proto.tls13.e_ckeyCOMMENT
LOWkern/gnutls_3_8_7_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_GNUTLS_3_8_7_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/gnutls_3_8_7_kern.c21// gnutls_session_int->key.proto.tls13.e_ckeyCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_4_0_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_4_0_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_4_0_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_4_0_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x18COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_4_0_kern.c61// bio_st->numCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_5_0_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_5_0_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_5_0_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_5_0_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x18COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_5_0_kern.c61// bio_st->numCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_masterkey_3.2.h1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_2_4_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_2_4_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_2_4_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_2_4_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x18COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_2_4_kern.c61// bio_st->numCOMMENT
LOWkern/tc.h1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_masterkey.h1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/bash_kern.c1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_a_15_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_BORINGSSL_A_15_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_a_15_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_a_15_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x10COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_a_15_kern.c61COMMENT
LOWkern/boringssl_a_15_kern.c81#define BSSL__SSL_HANDSHAKE_TLS13_STATE 0x18COMMENT
LOWkern/gnutls_3_6_13_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_GNUTLS_3_6_13_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/gnutls_3_6_13_kern.c21// gnutls_session_int->key.proto.tls13.e_ckeyCOMMENT
LOWkern/postgres_kern.c1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_2_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_3_2_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_2_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_2_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x18COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_2_kern.c61// bio_st->numCOMMENT
LOWkern/gotls_kern.c1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/gotls_kern.c141 int ret = bpf_probe_read_user(&fd, sizeof(fd), (void *)((u64)netfd_ptr + 16));COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl.h1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/ecapture.h1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/ecapture.h41 * supported by CLANG.COMMENT
LOWkern/ecapture.h61#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_0a_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_1_1_0_A_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_0a_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_0a_kern.c41#define BIO_ST_NUM 0x28COMMENT
LOWkern/nspr_kern.c1// Copyright 2022 CFC4N <cfc4n.cs@gmail.com>. All Rights Reserved.COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_1a_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_1_1_1_A_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_1a_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_1a_kern.c41#define SSL_ST_EARLY_SECRET 0x134COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_1_1_1a_kern.c61// bio_st->methodCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_0_12_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_0_12_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_0_12_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_0_12_kern.c41#define SSL_ST_EARLY_SECRET 0x544COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_0_12_kern.c61// bio_st->methodCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_0_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_3_0_KERN_HCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_0_kern.c21COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_0_kern.c41#define SSL_CIPHER_ST_ID 0x18COMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_3_0_kern.c61// bio_st->numCOMMENT
LOWkern/openssl_3_2_0_kern.c1#ifndef ECAPTURE_OPENSSL_3_2_0_KERN_HCOMMENT
297 more matches not shown…
Redundant / Tautological Comments59 hits · 93 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtest/e2e/gnutls_e2e_test.sh138 # Check if ecapture is still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/gnutls_e2e_test.sh173 # Check if ecapture log has contentCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/common.sh31# Check if running as rootCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/common.sh61# Check if command existsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/common.sh216# Check if a binary is linked against a specific libraryCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_advanced_test.sh41# Check if MySQL is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/bash_e2e_test.sh62 # Check if bash has readlineCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/bash_e2e_test.sh88 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/bash_e2e_test.sh139 # Check if we captured some bash commandsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_e2e_test.sh49# Check if MySQL is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_e2e_test.sh53 # Check if mysql client is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_e2e_test.sh59 # Check if MySQL server is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_e2e_test.sh79 # Check if MySQL is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_e2e_test.sh120 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/mysql_e2e_test.sh168 # Check if we captured some MySQL activityCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_text_advanced_test.sh343 # Check if output contains hex patterns (0x or just hex digits in specific format)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/zsh_e2e_test.sh58 # Check if zsh is installedCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/zsh_e2e_test.sh88 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/zsh_e2e_test.sh136 # Check if we captured some zsh commandsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_keylog_advanced_test.sh320 # Check if line starts with CLIENT_RANDOM or other valid key typesCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/edge_cases_test.sh184 # Check if process terminated gracefullyCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/edge_cases_test.sh219 # Check if process terminated gracefullyCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_e2e_test.sh71 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_e2e_test.sh160 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_e2e_test.sh185 # Check if it's a valid pcapng file by checking magic bytes (0x0A0D0D0A at offset 0)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_e2e_test.sh226 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_e2e_test.sh260 # Check if it contains CLIENT_RANDOM entries (standard keylog format)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/tls_e2e_test.sh383 # Check if any test failedCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/gotls_e2e_test.sh131 # Check if ecapture is still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/gotls_e2e_test.sh160 # Check if ecapture log has contentCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh255 # Check if client is running (meaning it connected and is receiving)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh365 # Check if any test failedCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/postgres_e2e_test.sh49# Check if PostgreSQL is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/postgres_e2e_test.sh53 # Check if psql client is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/postgres_e2e_test.sh59 # Check if PostgreSQL server is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/postgres_e2e_test.sh79 # Check if PostgreSQL is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/postgres_e2e_test.sh119 # Check if still runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/postgres_e2e_test.sh167 # Check if we captured some PostgreSQL activityCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/build_android_tests.sh34# Check if running on LinuxCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_tls_e2e_test.sh100 # Check if ecapture is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_tls_e2e_test.sh199 # Check if ecapture is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_tls_e2e_test.sh220 # Check if pcap file exists on deviceCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_tls_e2e_test.sh329 # Check if Go client exists locally and deploy itCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_tls_e2e_test.sh349 # Check if ecapture binary exists locallyCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_bash_e2e_test.sh93 # Check if ecapture is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_bash_e2e_test.sh289 # Check if sh/bash is available on device and record its pathCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_bash_e2e_test.sh306 # Check if ecapture binary exists locallyCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh32# Check if running on macOS (development environment)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh37# Check if ADB is availableCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh49# Check if Android device/emulator is connectedCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh137# Check if device is rootedCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh179# Set SELinux to permissive modeCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh324# Check if process is running on Android deviceCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh362# Check if file exists on Android deviceCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh492 # Check if resolv.conf has IPv6 loopback as nameserverCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/common_android.sh561# Check if command exists on Android deviceCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_gotls_e2e_test.sh119 # Check if ecapture is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_gotls_e2e_test.sh195 # Check if ecapture is runningCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/android_gotls_e2e_test.sh316 # Check if ecapture binary exists locallyCOMMENT
Decorative Section Separators25 hits · 84 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMkern/boringssl_const.h11// ── Android ≤ 15 (TLS 1.3 secrets are private raw arrays) ─────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMkern/boringssl_const.h31// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMkern/boringssl_const.h34// ── Android 16+: three root values differ from older versions ───────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMkern/boringssl_const.h46// ── Android ≤ 15: original layout ───────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMkern/boringssl_const.h59// ── Downstream offsets: identical formula for all versions ──────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMtest/e2e/common.sh271# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMtest/e2e/common.sh273# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go79// ── DecodeFromBytes ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go271// ── tuple() ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go316// ── String() / StringHex() ───────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go406// ── UUID() ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go454// ── Clone / Type / Validate ─────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go511// ── helper functions ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go555// ── IsRead / IsWrite ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go575// ── GetData / GetDataLen ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMinternal/probe/gotls/event_test.go595// ── DecodeFromBytes round-trip ───────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c42// ─── Type-trait probes ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c66// ─── Output helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c83// ─── Per-field emitters (partial template specialisation) ────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c149// ─── Main ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c155 // ── ssl_st ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c162 // ── ssl_session_st ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c167 // ── bio / cipher ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c173 // ── bssl::SSL3_STATE ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
MEDIUMutils/boringssl-offset.c180 // ── bssl::SSL_HANDSHAKE ───────────────────────────────────────────────────COMMENT
Structural Annotation Overuse24 hits · 42 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWkern/gotls_kern.c115 // Step 1: tls.Conn.conn is the first field (offset 0), it's an interface (16 bytes: type ptr + data ptr)COMMENT
LOWkern/gotls_kern.c123 // Step 2: net.TCPConn.conn (embedded field at offset 0)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh96 # Step 1: Start eCapture with ecaptureQ WebSocket serverCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh113 # Step 2: Connect ecaptureq_clientCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh132 # Step 3: Generate TLS traffic via curlCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh144 # Step 4: Stop processes gracefullyCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh162 # Step 5: Verify resultsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh19 # Step 1: Check ADBCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh26 # Step 2: Check device connectionCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh62 # Step 4: Check Android versionCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh70 # Step 5: Check kernelCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh78 # Step 6: Check architectureCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh86 # Step 7: Check root accessCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh117 # Step 9: Fix DNS resolutionCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh121 # Step 10: Check available toolsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh43 # Step 3: Display device infoCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh100 # Step 8: Check SELinuxCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh159 # Step 11: Check binariesCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh213 # Step 12: SummaryCOMMENT
LOWinternal/README.md106### Step 1: Define ConfigurationCOMMENT
LOWinternal/README.md123### Step 2: Define EventsCOMMENT
LOWinternal/README.md142### Step 3: Implement ProbeCOMMENT
LOWinternal/README.md169### Step 4: Register with FactoryCOMMENT
LOWinternal/README.md179### Step 5: Add TestsCOMMENT
Verbosity Indicators19 hits · 34 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWkern/gotls_kern.c115 // Step 1: tls.Conn.conn is the first field (offset 0), it's an interface (16 bytes: type ptr + data ptr)COMMENT
LOWkern/gotls_kern.c123 // Step 2: net.TCPConn.conn (embedded field at offset 0)COMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh96 # Step 1: Start eCapture with ecaptureQ WebSocket serverCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh113 # Step 2: Connect ecaptureq_clientCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh132 # Step 3: Generate TLS traffic via curlCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh144 # Step 4: Stop processes gracefullyCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/ecaptureq_e2e_test.sh162 # Step 5: Verify resultsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh19 # Step 1: Check ADBCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh26 # Step 2: Check device connectionCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh62 # Step 4: Check Android versionCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh70 # Step 5: Check kernelCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh78 # Step 6: Check architectureCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh86 # Step 7: Check root accessCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh117 # Step 9: Fix DNS resolutionCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh121 # Step 10: Check available toolsCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh43 # Step 3: Display device infoCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh100 # Step 8: Check SELinuxCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh159 # Step 11: Check binariesCOMMENT
LOWtest/e2e/android/setup_android_env.sh213 # Step 12: SummaryCOMMENT
AI Slop Vocabulary2 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMinternal/probe/openssl/config.go347 // Perhaps we can utilize the Android Version to choose a specific version of boringssl.COMMENT
MEDIUM.github/workflows/e2e.yml108 # Run comprehensive e2e tests with sudoCOMMENT