AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

fullstorydev/grpcui

Name: fullstorydev/grpcui — JavaScript Code Quality & Security Review | AI Slop Code Risk Monitor
Creator: AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

An interactive web UI for gRPC, along the lines of postman

3.5 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for fullstorydev/grpcui, a JavaScript project with 5,933 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 14,697 lines of code across 37 source files, recording 32 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 3.5 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

3.5

Adjusted Signal

3.5

Raw Pattern Score

100%

Time Factor

2026-10-15

Last Push

5.9K

Stars

JavaScript

Language

14.7K

Lines of Code

Files

Pattern Hits

2026-10-31

Scan Date

0.05

HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 10.0/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 29 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 6.9/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 3 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 0 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 16.2/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 32 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal: Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score: Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor: A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits: Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate: High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files: Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 2HIGH 0MEDIUM 1LOW 29

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 32 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Over-Commented Block28 hits · 28 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	handlers.go	21	"google.golang.org/grpc"	COMMENT
LOW	handlers.go	41	// Note that the returned handler does not implement any CSRF protection. To	COMMENT
LOW	doc.go	1	// Package grpcui provides a gRPC web UI in the form of HTTP handlers that can	COMMENT
LOW	webform.go	21	webFormTemplate = template.Must(template.New("grpc web form").Parse(string(webform.Template())))	COMMENT
LOW	webform.go	41	// pageHandler := func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {	COMMENT
LOW	webform.go	61	return WebFormContentsWithOptions(invokeURI, metadataURI, target, descs, WebFormOptions{})	COMMENT
LOW	webform.go	201	// Note that the script, by default, does not handle CSRF protection. To add	COMMENT
LOW	standalone/doc.go	1	// Package standalone provides a stand-alone HTTP handler that provides a	COMMENT
LOW	standalone/doc.go	21	// return err	COMMENT
LOW	standalone/opts.go	61	// AddJSFile is like AddJS except that the contents are provided in the form of	COMMENT
LOW	standalone/opts.go	81	})	COMMENT
LOW	standalone/opts.go	121	// given name is "foo/bar" and a request is made for "foo/bar/baz/buzz", then	COMMENT
LOW	internal/resources/webform/webform.js	301	* such as different border, then the message that contains it). The	COMMENT
LOW	internal/resources/webform/webform.js	641	}	COMMENT
LOW	internal/resources/webform/webform.js	2481		COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test.pb.go	181	// an error space that is not known in this address space. Also	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test.pb.go	201	RpcStatusCode_DEADLINE_EXCEEDED RpcStatusCode = 4	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test.pb.go	221	// used if the caller can not be identified (use `UNAUTHENTICATED`	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test.pb.go	241	// a non-directory, etc.	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test.pb.go	261	// See the guidelines above for deciding between `FAILED_PRECONDITION`,	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test.pb.go	281	//	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	21	const _ = grpc.SupportPackageIsVersion7	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	41	// The DownloadMany method is like Exchange, except that it is for testing RPCs that have	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	61	// form that has only the single Any message input.	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	81	// SendDouble is for testing the UI web form, that it can construct a request	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	921	Ping(context.Context, emptypb.Empty) (emptypb.Empty, error)	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	941	// stream, so each request is mirrored to the response stream as it is received.	COMMENT
LOW	testing/cmd/testsvr/test_grpc.pb.go	961	SendValue(context.Context, structpb.Value) (emptypb.Empty, error)	COMMENT

Hallucination Indicators2 hits · 20 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
CRITICAL	internal/resources/standalone/jquery-3.4.1.min.js	2	!function(e,t){"use strict";"object"==typeof module&&"object"==typeof module.exports?module.exports=e.document?t(e,!0):f	CODE
CRITICAL	internal/resources/standalone/jquery-ui-1.12.1.min.js	6	(function(t){"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define(["jquery"],t):t(jQuery)})(function(t){function e(t){for(var e=	CODE

Self-Referential Comments1 hit · 3 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
MEDIUM	releasing/do-release.sh	49	# Create a new builder instance	COMMENT

Fake / Example Data1 hit · 1 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	internal/resources/standalone/jquery-ui-1.12.1.min.js	13	}),a.closing=!0,this._trigger("close",e,{tooltip:i}),a.hiding\|\|(a.closing=!1)),void 0):(n.removeData("ui-tooltip-open"),	CODE