AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs

SlopCodeMonitor badge for fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

The most advanced free and open-source browser fingerprinting library

3.4 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs, a TypeScript project with 28,662 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 10,901 lines of code across 146 source files, recording 25 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 3.4 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

3.4
Adjusted Signal
3.4
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-21
Last Push
28.7K
Stars
TypeScript
Language
10.9K
Lines of Code
146
Files
25
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.01
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 11.7/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 23 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 4.5/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 2 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 8.3/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 19 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 16.4/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 25 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 2MEDIUM 2LOW 21

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 25 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers19 hits · 19 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW…ources/content_blocking/get_unique_filter_selectors.ts100async function getSelectorsFromDirectory(directoryPath: string) {CODE
LOWresources/content_blocking/make_selectors_tester.ts71function getSelectorFromFilterRule(rule: string): string | undefined {CODE
LOWresources/content_blocking/make_selectors_tester.ts112async function getJsToDetectBlockedSelectors(selectors: readonly string[]) {CODE
LOWtests/utils/index.ts93export function getBrowserEngineMajorVersion(): number | undefined {CODE
LOWsrc/agent.ts82function componentsToCanonicalString(components: UnknownComponents) {CODE
LOWsrc/utils/async.ts22export function requestIdleCallbackIfAvailable(fallbackTimeout: number, deadlineTimeout = Infinity): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/canvas.ts35export function getUnstableCanvasFingerprint(skipImages?: boolean): CanvasFingerprint {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/canvas.ts165function doesBrowserPerformAntiFingerprinting() {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/audio.ts41export function getUnstableAudioFingerprint(): number | (() => Promise<number>) {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/audio.ts98function doesBrowserSuspendAudioContext() {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/audio.ts106function doesBrowserPerformAntifingerprinting() {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/private_click_measurement.ts13export default function getPrivateClickMeasurement(): string | undefined {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/audio_base_latency.ts12export default function getAudioContextBaseLatency(): number {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/audio.test.ts43function doesBrowserPerformAntifingerprinting() {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/audio.test.ts49function doesBrowserSuspendAudioContext() {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/screen_resolution.ts25export function getUnstableScreenResolution(): ScreenResolution {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/webgl.ts241export function shouldAvoidDebugRendererInfo(): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/webgl.ts249export function shouldAvoidPolygonModeExtensions(): boolean {CODE
LOWsrc/sources/hardware_concurrency.ts30export function getUnstableHardwareConcurrency(): number | undefined {CODE
Cross-Language Confusion (JS/TS)2 hits · 10 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGH…ources/content_blocking/get_unique_filter_selectors.ts69 print(`Filter "${filterName}" has no selectors`)CODE
HIGH…ources/content_blocking/get_unique_filter_selectors.ts82 print(message)CODE
AI Slop Vocabulary2 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMrollup.config.ts60 // UMD for users who use Require.js or Electron and want to leverage themCOMMENT
MEDIUMsrc/sources/cookies_enabled.ts12 // navigator.cookieEnabled cannot detect custom or nuanced cookie blocking configurations. For example, when blockingCOMMENT
Over-Commented Block2 hits · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.github/workflows/codeql_analysis.yml1# For most projects, this workflow file will not need changing; you simply needCOMMENT
LOWsrc/confidence.ts41 // WindowsCOMMENT