AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

dunglas/mercure

SlopCodeMonitor badge for dunglas/mercure Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

🪽 An open, easy, fast, reliable and battery-efficient solution for real-time communications

1.1 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for dunglas/mercure, a Go project with 5,356 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 41,694 lines of code across 251 source files, recording 44 pattern matches distributed across 2 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 1.1 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

1.1
Adjusted Signal
1.1
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-30
Last Push
5.4K
Stars
Go
Language
41.7K
Lines of Code
251
Files
44
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 5.0/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 43 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.1/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 1 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 5.1/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 44 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 0LOW 44

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 44 distinct pattern matches across 2 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Over-Commented Block43 hits · 43 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsubscription.go81 Type string `json:"type"`COMMENT
LOWsubscription.go101// against this hub, a mistake every other conforming hub would expose.COMMENT
LOWauthorizationclaims_deprecated.go1//go:build deprecated_claimCOMMENT
LOWauthorizationdetails.go41// authorizationDetail is one entry of the RFC 9396 authorization_detailsCOMMENT
LOWsubscribe.go461// declaring a media type the hub cannot read.COMMENT
LOWhub.go41// ErrMissingIssuerIdentifier is returned when an issuer is configured in modernCOMMENT
LOWhub.go61COMMENT
LOWhub.go121 }COMMENT
LOWbearererror.go21// with a 401 and a bare RFC 6750 Bearer challenge, advertising the protectedCOMMENT
LOWbearererror.go81 }COMMENT
LOWmatcher_deprecated.go1//go:build deprecated_topicCOMMENT
LOWsubscriber.go21 // SubscribedMatchers are the topic matchers from the topic andCOMMENT
LOWsubscriber.go141// per RFC 3986 path rules — and (c) matches a URI Template `{var}`COMMENT
LOWclaimrequirestopic_deprecated.go1//go:build deprecated_claim && !deprecated_topicCOMMENT
LOWresourcemetadata.go21// separate publisher and subscriber key sets.COMMENT
LOWjwtkeyfunc.go21 // resource metadata. Leave false for self-issued tokens (a key shared outCOMMENT
LOWauthorization.go41const (COMMENT
LOWtopicmatcher.go141// field. It is a NUL byte, which the publish and subscribe handlers reject inCOMMENT
LOWmatcherclaim.go61// UnmarshalJSON handles both string and object formats in JWT claims.COMMENT
LOWpublish.go61// Validate enforces the publish-side input rules that protect subscribersCOMMENT
LOWsubscribematchers.go21 // selects that matcher type; bare "match" defaults to Exact, mirroring theCOMMENT
LOWsubscribematchers.go41 errUnknownMatcherParam = errors.New("unknown topic matcher query parameter")COMMENT
LOWconformance-tests/playwright.config.ts61 name: "webkit",COMMENT
LOWconformance-tests/playwright.config.ts81 /* Test against branded browsers. */COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml1# Default values for mercure.COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml21# -- Origins the hub answers on (`public_urls`), others get `421 Misdirected Request`.COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml41# valueFrom:COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml101replicaCount: 1 # @schema minimum:1COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml141 create: trueCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml221 # @default -- See [values.yaml](values.yaml).COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml241 annotations: {}COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml261 # filters:COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml281 # # Supplying `rules` opts out of the auto-default. UseCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml301 # - IngressCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml321 # kubernetes.io/metadata.name: kube-systemCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml341 # - matchLabels:COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml361 # - port: "53"COMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml381 # cpu: 100mCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml401 # name: mercure_subscribers_connectedCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml421# -- [Affinity](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#affinity-and-anti-affinity) conCOMMENT
LOWcharts/mercure/values.yaml441 enabled: falseCOMMENT
LOW.github/linters/.markdown-lint.yml1---COMMENT
LOWcaddy/mercure.go201 CookieName string `json:"cookie_name,omitempty"`COMMENT
Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWdocs/use-cases/async-jobs.md145except Exception:CODE