AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

changesets/changesets

SlopCodeMonitor badge for changesets/changesets Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

🦋 A tool to manage versioning and changelogs with a focus on monorepos

0.6 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for changesets/changesets, a TypeScript project with 12,548 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 54,366 lines of code across 302 source files, recording 24 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 0.6 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

0.6
Adjusted Signal
0.6
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-26
Last Push
12.5K
Stars
TypeScript
Language
54.4K
Lines of Code
302
Files
24
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 2.8/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 24 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 1.7/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 19 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 2.6/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 24 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 1MEDIUM 0LOW 23

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 24 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers19 hits · 19 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/test-utils/src/index.ts121export async function disableGitBackgroundMaintenance(cwd: string) {CODE
LOWscripts/e2e/publish.test.ts402function getPackageTarballFilename(packageName: string, version: string) {CODE
LOWscripts/e2e/e2e-utils.ts167async function resolvePackageManagerSpec(CODE
LOW…ages/assemble-release-plan/src/determine-dependents.ts173function getDependencyVersionRanges(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/utils/workspaceConcurrency.ts12export function getDefaultWorkspaceConcurrency() {CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/utils/versionablePackages.ts5export async function getVersionableChangedPackages(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/lib/yarn.ts42export function getYarnBerryReporterError(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/commands/pack/index.ts34function getNormalizedTarballFilename(name: string, version: string) {CODE
LOW…ckages/cli/src/commands/publish-plan/getPublishPlan.ts204export async function getUntaggedPrivatePackages(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/commands/add/createChangeset.ts91function validateSelectedPackageNames(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/commands/add/createChangeset.ts113function validateDuplicatePackageNames(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/commands/version/index.ts159function validateIgnoredPackageNames(CODE
LOWpackages/cli/src/commands/version/index.ts182function validateSkippedDependents(CODE
LOWpackages/apply-release-plan/src/get-changelog-entry.ts121export function generateMarkdownForVersionType(CODE
LOWpackages/apply-release-plan/src/version-package.ts27export function getDependencyVersionEdits(CODE
LOWpackages/apply-release-plan/src/utils.ts20export function shouldUpdateDependencyBasedOnConfig(CODE
LOWpackages/apply-release-plan/src/index.ts29async function getCommitsThatAddChangesets(CODE
LOWpackages/git/src/index.ts242export async function getChangedChangesetFilesSinceRef({CODE
LOWpackages/git/src/index.ts278export async function getChangedPackagesSinceRef({CODE
Synthetic Comment Markers1 hit · 8 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHpackages/assemble-release-plan/src/index.test.ts1255 // Sanity check: the dependency itself bumped as requested.COMMENT
Over-Commented Block3 hits · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWpackages/parse/README.md21// {COMMENT
LOWpackages/cli/src/lib/npm.ts181// an exact version, this is effectively an exact match. When `latest`COMMENT
LOWpackages/cli/src/lib/npm.ts341 // So we'd have to call npm from the root with a nested package target because `.npmrc` would resolve in respect to cwCOMMENT
TODO Padding1 hit · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWpackages/cli/src/commands/publish/index.ts246 // TODO: implement in follow-up PRCOMMENT