AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

byoungd/up

SlopCodeMonitor badge for byoungd/up Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

韩先凯的人生进阶指南 AI时代 中英双语终身学习指南:AI、学习 、创业、财富、爱情与人生

0.7 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for byoungd/up, a JavaScript project with 69,796 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 45,193 lines of code across 309 source files, recording 20 pattern matches distributed across 5 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 0.7 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

0.7
Adjusted Signal
0.7
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-30
Last Push
69.8K
Stars
JavaScript
Language
45.2K
Lines of Code
309
Files
20
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.01
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 2.3/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 14 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.6/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 5 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 1.6/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 8 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 3.3/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 20 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 2MEDIUM 0LOW 18

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 20 distinct pattern matches across 5 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers7 hits · 10 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/pdf_layout_test.py39 def test_chinese_headings_wrap_with_anchors_at_every_level(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/pdf_layout_test.py52 def test_english_styles_keep_their_normal_word_wrap(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/pdf_layout_test.py57 def test_wide_template_rows_preserve_every_character(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/pdf_layout_test.py66 def test_indented_long_tokens_keep_content_and_continuation_indent(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/pdf_layout_test.py76 def test_chinese_code_uses_embedded_font_widths_and_padding(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/pdf_layout_test.py85 def test_existing_blank_lines_tabs_and_short_indentation_are_retained(self):CODE
LOW⚡tests/pdf_layout_test.py90 def test_pre_conversion_escapes_after_wrapping_and_has_no_overflow(self):CODE
Deep Nesting6 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py159CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py285CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py593CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py641CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py726CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py922CODE
Synthetic Comment Markers1 hit · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHdocs/en/threads/part-5/book-as-proof.md115One working rule matters: a fluent sentence generated by AI does not earn admission into the manuscript. It must face foCODE
Unused Imports5 hits · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py3CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py9CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py18CODE
LOWscripts/build-pdf.py32CODE
LOWscripts/subset-pdf-fonts.py3CODE
Empty Error Handlers1 hit · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHscripts/build-pdf.py412except ValueError:CODE