AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

bililive-go/bililive-go

SlopCodeMonitor badge for bililive-go/bililive-go Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

一个直播录制工具

0.7 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for bililive-go/bililive-go, a Go project with 5,830 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 96,052 lines of code across 395 source files, recording 39 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 0.7 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

0.7
Adjusted Signal
0.7
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-31
Last Push
5.8K
Stars
Go
Language
96.1K
Lines of Code
395
Files
39
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 3.2/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 39 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 0 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 2.4/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 39 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 4LOW 35

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 39 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Over-Commented Block23 hits · 23 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWdocker-compose.yml21# - prometheus_data:/prometheusCOMMENT
LOWdocker-compose.yml41# - GF_SECURITY_ADMIN_PASSWORD=${ADMIN_PASSWORD}COMMENT
LOWtools/devtools.go1//go:build toolsCOMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/claude.yml41 actions: readCOMMENT
LOWsrc/cmd/bililive/bililive.go861 // WaitGroup 只覆盖 Server、ListenerManager 和 RecorderManager。COMMENT
LOWsrc/webapp/src/serviceWorker.ts1// This optional code is used to register a service worker.COMMENT
LOWsrc/webapp/src/setupTests.ts1// jest-dom adds custom jest matchers for asserting on DOM nodes.COMMENT
LOWsrc/webapp/src/component/config-info/shared-fields.tsx101 </Space>COMMENT
LOWsrc/recorders/manager_test.go81// TestRestartRecorderRaceWithLiveEnd 验证 RestartRecorder 和 LiveEnd(RemoveRecorder)COMMENT
LOWsrc/recorders/recorder.go241 Close()COMMENT
LOWsrc/configs/feature_flags.go1package configsCOMMENT
LOWsrc/live/internal/base_live.go41 requestSession = requests.NewSession(client)COMMENT
LOWsrc/live/douyu/refresh.go1// Package douyu 中的 cookie 自动续期实现(refresh.go)COMMENT
LOWsrc/live/douyu/refresh.go41 // 取 3 天续期一次,留足一倍缓冲,兼顾"不频繁轮换"与"宕机后仍能赶在过期前补续"。COMMENT
LOWsrc/live/douyu/refresh.go61// ShouldEscalateTempFailure 判断一次"临时性失败"是否应升级为需重新扫码的提醒。COMMENT
LOWsrc/live/douyu/refresh.go101COMMENT
LOWsrc/live/sooplive/sooplive.go181 }COMMENT
LOWsrc/servers/handler.go1141}COMMENT
LOWsrc/servers/douyu_keeper.go141 // LTP0 只归 douyu_auth 一处存放;设备号由写回侧统一取舍(现有 cookie 已有则挡新值,一个都没有则补种)COMMENT
LOWsrc/pkg/launcher/launcher.go21// State 启动器状态(存储在 appdata/launcher-state.json)COMMENT
LOWsrc/pkg/parser/ffmpeg/ffmpeg.go161// 本函数的 ctx 参数实际上无法取消函数执行——核心阻塞点 cmd.Wait()(第 272 行)不监听 ctx.Done(),COMMENT
LOWsrc/pkg/migration/doc.go1// Package migration 提供通用的数据库迁移框架COMMENT
LOWsrc/pkg/migration/doc.go21// Type: migration.DatabaseTypeMetadata,COMMENT
AI Slop Vocabulary4 hits · 16 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM⚡tools/devtools.go9// go install github.com/go-delve/delve/cmd/dlv@latestCOMMENT
MEDIUM⚡tools/devtools.go18 // delve debugger - VSCode Go 扩展使用COMMENT
MEDIUM⚡tools/devtools.go28//go:generate go install github.com/go-delve/delve/cmd/dlvCOMMENT
MEDIUM.vscode/launch.example.json6// go install github.com/go-delve/delve/cmd/dlv@latestCOMMENT
Verbosity Indicators6 hits · 12 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go34 // Step 1: 获取 ttwidCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go46 // Step 2: 获取真实 roomIdCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go55 // Step 3: 生成 user_unique_idCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go59 // Step 4: 构建 URLCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go62 // Step 5: 生成 signatureCOMMENT
LOWsrc/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go73 // Step 6: 尝试连接COMMENT
Structural Annotation Overuse6 hits · 12 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go34 // Step 1: 获取 ttwidCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go46 // Step 2: 获取真实 roomIdCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go55 // Step 3: 生成 user_unique_idCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go59 // Step 4: 构建 URLCOMMENT
LOW⚡src/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go62 // Step 5: 生成 signatureCOMMENT
LOWsrc/recorders/danmaku/douyin/client_test.go73 // Step 6: 尝试连接COMMENT