AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

bentoml/OpenLLM

SlopCodeMonitor badge for bentoml/OpenLLM Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).
10.0 Moderate pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for bentoml/OpenLLM. SynthScan examined 3,255 lines of code across 29 source files, recording 27 pattern matches distributed across 6 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 10.0 (Moderate pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

10.0
Adjusted Signal
10.0
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
—
Last Push
—
Stars
—
Language
3.3K
Lines of Code
29
Files
27
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.03
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 18.7/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 12 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 14.2/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 10 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 15.6/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 7 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 38.8/100 · MEDIUM

Which changes need focused human review? 27 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

Run additional scans to build a history of the legacy pattern signal. Score changes are not a measure of AI adoption or code quality.

No multi-scan history yet — run the scanner again to build trend data.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 1MEDIUM 0LOW 26

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 27 distinct pattern matches across 6 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Unused Imports10 hits · 10 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/openllm/clean.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/cloud.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/local.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/accelerator_spec.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/venv.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/model.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/common.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/repo.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/analytic.py1CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/__main__.py1CODE
Deep Nesting7 hits · 7 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/openllm/cloud.py20CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/cloud.py134CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/local.py69CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/model.py122CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/common.py265CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/repo.py144CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/__main__.py129CODE
Empty Error Handlers1 hit · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHsrc/openllm/common.py239except KeyError:CODE
Redundant / Tautological Comments3 hits · 4 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWrelease.sh21# Check if release flag is providedCOMMENT
LOWrelease.sh23 # Check if release argument is providedCOMMENT
LOWrelease.sh51# Check if current version is an alpha version and split accordinglyCOMMENT
Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping4 hits · 4 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/openllm/accelerator_spec.py107 except Exception as e:CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/venv.py76 except Exception as e:CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/common.py373 except Exception as e:CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/repo.py65 except Exception as e:CODE
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers2 hits · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/openllm/common.py117 def __get_pydantic_core_schema__(CODE
LOWsrc/openllm/common.py265 def normalized_requirements_txt(self) -> str:CODE