AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

ardalis/CleanArchitecture

SlopCodeMonitor badge for ardalis/CleanArchitecture Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

Clean Architecture Solution Template: A proven Clean Architecture Template for ASP.NET Core 10

2.2 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for ardalis/CleanArchitecture, a C# project with 18,532 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 15,994 lines of code across 443 source files, recording 24 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 2.2 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

2.2
Adjusted Signal
2.2
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-09-21
Last Push
18.5K
Stars
C#
Language
16.0K
Lines of Code
443
Files
24
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 7.7/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 15 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 2.8/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 9 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 0 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 8.7/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 24 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 1MEDIUM 0LOW 23

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 24 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Structural Annotation Overuse7 hits · 14 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWdocs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md233#### Step 1: Extract Core ProjectCOMMENT
LOWdocs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md246#### Step 2: Extract Infrastructure ProjectCOMMENT
LOWdocs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md259#### Step 3: Extract UseCases (Optional)COMMENT
LOW⚡docs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md271#### Step 4: Clean Up Web ProjectCOMMENT
LOW⚡docs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md281#### Step 1: Merge ProjectsCOMMENT
LOW⚡docs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md288#### Step 2: Simplify PatternsCOMMENT
LOW⚡docs/content/minimal-clean-architecture.md294#### Step 3: Organize VerticallyCOMMENT
Fake / Example Data9 hits · 9 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW…ple/src/NimblePros.SampleToDo.Web/Contributors/List.cs24 new(1, "John Doe"),CODE
LOW…e/src/NimblePros.SampleToDo.Web/Contributors/Create.cs30 s.ExampleRequest = new CreateContributorRequest { Name = "John Doe" };CODE
LOW…e/src/NimblePros.SampleToDo.Web/Contributors/Create.cs31 s.ResponseExamples[201] = new CreateContributorResponse(1, "John Doe");CODE
LOW…/src/NimblePros.SampleToDo.Web/Contributors/GetById.cs25 s.ResponseExamples[200] = new ContributorRecord(1, "John Doe");CODE
LOW…gate/Handlers/ItemCompletedEmailNotificationHandler.cs23 await _emailSender.SendEmailAsync("test@test.com", "test@test.com",CODE
LOWsrc/Clean.Architecture.Web/Contributors/List.cs25 new(1, "John Doe", PhoneNumber.Unknown.ToString()),CODE
LOWsrc/Clean.Architecture.Web/Contributors/Create.cs31 s.ExampleRequest = new CreateContributorRequest { Name = "John Doe" };CODE
LOWsrc/Clean.Architecture.Web/Contributors/Create.cs32 s.ResponseExamples[201] = new CreateContributorResponse(1, "John Doe");CODE
LOWsrc/Clean.Architecture.Web/Contributors/GetById.cs27 s.ResponseExamples[200] = new ContributorRecord(1, "John Doe", "+1 555-555-5555");CODE
Over-Commented Block7 hits · 7 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW…tecture.Web/Infrastructure/Data/AppDbContextFactory.cs1using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/publish-templates.yml61 # dotnet build TestFullTemplate/TestFullTemplate.slnxCOMMENT
LOW…-validation-unobtrusive/jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js261 /// <param name="params" type="Array" optional="true">[Optional] An array of parameter names (strings) that willCOMMENT
LOW…-validation-unobtrusive/jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js281 /// of adapterName will be used instead.</param>COMMENT
LOW…idation-unobtrusive/jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js1// Unobtrusive validation support library for jQuery and jQuery ValidateCOMMENT
LOW…ntributors/Commands/Delete/DeleteContributorHandler.cs21 // var aggregateToDelete = await _repository.GetByIdAsync(request.ContributorId);COMMENT
LOWsrc/Clean.Architecture.Web/appsettings.json21 {COMMENT
AI Response Leakage1 hit · 5 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHdocs/content/design-decisions.md95Test projects could be organized based on the kind of test (unit, functional, integration, performance, etc.) or by the CODE