AI Slop Code RIsk Monitor

YouMind-OpenLab/nano-banana-pro-prompts-recommend-skill

AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart search by use case, content remix, sample images.

4.5 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Maintenance and Governance Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for YouMind-OpenLab/nano-banana-pro-prompts-recommend-skill, a TypeScript project with 1,872 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 13,452 lines of code across 14 source files, recording 27 pattern matches distributed across 6 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 4.5 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

4.5
Adjusted Signal
4.5
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-11
Last Push
1.9K
Stars
TypeScript
Language
13.5K
Lines of Code
14
Files
27
Pattern Hits
2026-10-12
Scan Date
0.36
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · v3

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 20.0/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 26 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.4/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 1 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.0/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 0 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 21.8/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 27 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 5MEDIUM 7LOW 15

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 27 distinct pattern matches across 6 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Synthetic Comment Markers5 hits · 25 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json398 "description": "A summary of a cinematic food short video prompt, which was used to generate images in Nano Banana PCODE
HIGHreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json462 "description": "A prompt used for image generation (Nano Banana Pro) and subsequent video generation (Kling 3.0 OmniCODE
HIGHreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json482 "description": "A prompt, generated by GPT-5, used to create images with Nano Banana Pro that were then sequenced inCODE
HIGHreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json533 "description": "A summarized prompt, generated by GPT-5, used for both image generation (Nano Banana Pro) and subseqCODE
HIGHreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json607 "description": "A cinematic video prompt, generated by GPT-5 and used for Kling 3.0 Omni, describing a four-cut sequCODE
Structural Annotation Overuse10 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWSKILL.md146### Step 0: Auto-Update References (MANDATORY, runs every time)COMMENT
LOWSKILL.md172### Step 1: Clarify Vague RequestsCOMMENT
LOWSKILL.md191### Step 2: Search & MatchCOMMENT
LOWSKILL.md198### Step 3: Present ResultsCOMMENT
LOWSKILL.md272### Step 4: Handle No Match (Generate Custom Prompt)COMMENT
LOWSKILL.md302### Step 5: Remix & Personalization (Content Illustration Mode Only)COMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js52 // Step 1: Fetch manifest — discover categories dynamicallyCOMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js72 // Step 2: Clean up stale files not in current manifestCOMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js83 // Step 3: Download each category fileCOMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js103 // Step 4: Write timestampCOMMENT
AI Slop Vocabulary4 hits · 8 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json1629 "content": "## 1. Input Variables (Rewrite this)\nGenerate an illustration based on the following information.\n\nUsCODE
MEDIUMreferences/youtube-thumbnail.json1951 "content": "Read the motif depicted in the attached image, generate multi-angle shots, and create four scenes divideCODE
MEDIUMreferences/app-web-design.json1821 "content": "Luxury Korean tasting menu, editorial layout, 2+2 large grid composition, 4:5 aspect ratio.\n\nLAYOUT: 2CODE
MEDIUMreferences/app-web-design.json2130 "content": "# Directive (Instruction)\n**Immediately generate** a clean, modern mockup image of the highest quality CODE
Modern AI Meta-Vocabulary3 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMreferences/infographic-edu-visual.json1265 "content": "# Instructions\nYou are a professional illustrator and prompt engineer.\nRead the following [Blog SummarCODE
MEDIUMreferences/infographic-edu-visual.json4218 "content": "diagram:\n title: \"{argument name=\"diagram title\" default=\"The Cycle of the Generative AI Agent DevCODE
MEDIUMreferences/app-web-design.json673 "content": "# Instructions\nYou are a professional illustrator and prompt engineer.\nRead the following [Blog SummarCODE
Verbosity Indicators4 hits · 6 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/setup.js52 // Step 1: Fetch manifest — discover categories dynamicallyCOMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js72 // Step 2: Clean up stale files not in current manifestCOMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js83 // Step 3: Download each category fileCOMMENT
LOWscripts/setup.js103 // Step 4: Write timestampCOMMENT
Fake / Example Data1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWreferences/infographic-edu-visual.json2926 "content": "Input Variable: {argument name=\"input objects\" default=\"[INSERT 1 or 2 OBJECTS]\"} \nInstruction:\nAcCODE