SunWeb3Sec/DeFiHackLabs

4.1

Adjusted Score

4.1

Raw Score

100%

Time Factor

2026-07-07

Last Push

6.6K

Stars

Solidity

Language

34.0K

Lines of Code

Files

104

Pattern Hits

2026-07-14

Scan Date

0.02

HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score: Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score: The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor: The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits: Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate: High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files: Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 2HIGH 0MEDIUM 14LOW 88

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 104 distinct pattern matches across 7 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers56 hits · 42 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW⚡	add_new_entry.py	603	def _update_table_of_contents(self, content: str, formatted_date: str, name: str, additional_details: str) -> str:	CODE
LOW	add_new_entry.py	412	def is_cast_command_available(self) -> bool:	CODE
LOW	add_new_entry.py	454	def get_timestamp_from_tx_hash(self, tx_hash: str, rpc_url: str, auto_confirm: bool = False) -> str:	CODE
LOW	add_new_entry.py	504	def get_addresses_from_tx_hash(self, tx_hash: str, rpc_url: str) -> Optional[Tuple[str, str, str]]:	CODE
LOW	add_new_entry.py	729	def get_uncommitted_sol_files(self):	CODE
LOW	add_new_entry.py	746	def get_recently_committed_sol_files(self) -> list:	CODE
LOW⚡	test.py	945	def test_timestamp_and_tx_hash_are_mutually_exclusive(self):	CODE
LOW⚡	test.py	950	def test_main_without_network_runs_interactive(self):	CODE
LOW⚡	test.py	958	def test_main_non_interactive_requires_file_and_amount(self):	CODE
LOW⚡	test.py	964	def test_main_non_interactive_dispatches_to_add_entry_cli(self):	CODE
LOW⚡	test.py	973	def test_add_entry_cli_updates_readme_with_network(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	38	def test_constants_initialization(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	109	def test_parse_foundry_toml_file_not_found(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	121	def test_parse_foundry_toml_decode_error(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	136	def test_update_foundry_toml_success(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	167	def test_update_foundry_toml_file_not_found(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	176	def test_select_network_choose_existing(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	195	def test_select_network_add_new(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	238	def test_select_network_invalid_choice(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	264	def test_is_cast_command_available_true(self, mock_check_output):	CODE
LOW	test.py	275	def test_is_cast_command_available_false(self, mock_check_output):	CODE
LOW	test.py	287	def test_run_cast_command_success(self, mock_run):	CODE
LOW	test.py	311	def test_run_cast_command_error(self, mock_run):	CODE
LOW	test.py	336	def test_get_timestamp_from_str_valid(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	346	def test_get_timestamp_from_str_empty(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	358	def test_get_timestamp_from_str_invalid(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	374	def test_get_timestamp_from_tx_hash_success(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	404	def test_get_addresses_from_tx_hash_success(self, mock_run_cast):	CODE
LOW	test.py	432	def test_get_addresses_from_tx_hash_with_contract_creation(self, mock_run_cast):	CODE
LOW	test.py	501	def test_update_readme_file_not_found(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	587	def test_update_sum_of_incidents(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	595	def test_get_run_command_without_shanghai(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	607	def test_get_run_command_with_shanghai(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	620	def test_check_readme_entry_exists(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	630	def test_check_readme_entry_not_exists(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	707	def test_create_poc_solidity_file_template_not_found(self, mock_open):	CODE
LOW	test.py	722	def test_replace_placeholders(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	742	def test_is_git_command_available_true(self, mock_check_output):	CODE
LOW	test.py	753	def test_is_git_command_available_false(self, mock_check_output):	CODE
LOW	test.py	763	def test_get_uncommitted_sol_files_success(self, mock_check_output):	CODE
LOW	test.py	777	def test_get_uncommitted_sol_files_git_not_available(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	788	def test_get_recently_committed_sol_files_success(self, mock_check_output):	CODE
LOW	test.py	802	def test_get_recently_committed_sol_files_git_not_available(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	844	def test_get_file_extra_info_basic(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	870	def test_add_new_entry_with_poc_file(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	916	def test_process_existing_files(self, mock_input):	CODE
LOW	test.py	986	def test_add_entry_cli_unknown_network_without_rpc_fails(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	996	def test_add_entry_cli_registers_network_with_rpc(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	1008	def test_add_entry_cli_create_poc(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	1020	def test_get_timestamp_auto_confirm_skips_prompt(self):	CODE
LOW	test.py	88	def test_parse_foundry_toml_success(self, mock_open):	STRING
LOW	test.py	486	def test_update_readme_success(self, mock_open):	STRING
LOW	test.py	566	def test_update_table_of_contents(self):	STRING
LOW	test.py	675	def test_create_poc_solidity_file_success(self, mock_open, mock_makedirs):	STRING
LOW	academy/solidity/02_first_deposit/readme.md	26	function exchangeRateStoredInternal() virtual internal view returns (uint) {	CODE
LOW	academy/solidity/02_first_deposit/en/readme.md	24	function exchangeRateStoredInternal() virtual internal view returns (uint) {	CODE

Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping15 hits · 38 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	334	print(f"Error: {self.constants.FOUNDRY_TOML_PATH} not found. Please ensure the file exists in the current di	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	337	print(f"Error: Could not decode {self.constants.FOUNDRY_TOML_PATH}. Please check its format.")	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	346	print(f"Error: {self.constants.FOUNDRY_TOML_PATH} not found. Cannot update RPC endpoints.")	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	349	print(f"Error: Could not decode {self.constants.FOUNDRY_TOML_PATH}. Cannot update RPC endpoints.")	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	359	print(f"Error: Could not write to {self.constants.FOUNDRY_TOML_PATH}.")	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	428	print(f"Error calling 'cast' for {command_description}: {e}")	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	433	print(f"Error parsing JSON output from 'cast' for {command_description}.")	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	597	print(f"Error: Could not find insertion point in {self.constants.README_PATH} using regex: {self.constants.L	CODE
MEDIUM⚡	add_new_entry.py	611	print(f"Error: Could not find Table of Contents section in {self.constants.README_PATH} using regex: {self.c	CODE
MEDIUM	add_new_entry.py	290	print(f"Error: network '{args.network}' not found in {self.constants.FOUNDRY_TOML_PATH}. "	CODE
MEDIUM	add_new_entry.py	547	print(f"Error: {self.constants.README_PATH} not found. Please ensure the file exists in the current director	CODE
MEDIUM	add_new_entry.py	641	print(f"Error: {self.constants.README_PATH} not found. Cannot check for existing entries.")	CODE
MEDIUM	add_new_entry.py	673	print(f"Error: {self.constants.POC_TEMPLATE_PATH} not found. Cannot create POC file.")	CODE
LOW⚡	add_new_entry.py	438	except Exception as e:	CODE
MEDIUM	test.py	30	print("Error: Could not import the DefiHackLibrary module.")	CODE

Structural Annotation Overuse16 hits · 30 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	CONTRIBUTING.md	19	### Step 1: Fork and Clone the Repository	COMMENT
LOW⚡	CONTRIBUTING.md	116	### Step 2: Automatic Updates	COMMENT
LOW⚡	CONTRIBUTING.md	124	### Step 3: Implement the Exploit Code	COMMENT
LOW⚡	CONTRIBUTING.md	134	### Step 4: Test and Commit Your Changes	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/ko/readme.md	314	### Step 4: 취약점 분석	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/ko/readme.md	382	### Step 5: 공격 재현	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/en/readme.md	95	### Step 1: Information gathering	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/en/readme.md	114	### Step 2: Transaction Debugging	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/en/readme.md	166	### Step 3: Reproduce code	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/en/readme.md	310	### Step 4: Analyzing the exploit	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/en/readme.md	379	### Step 5: Reproduce	COMMENT
LOW⚡	academy/user_awareness/06_Report_stolen/en/readme.md	103	### Step 1: transfer any remaining assets	COMMENT
LOW⚡	academy/user_awareness/06_Report_stolen/en/readme.md	111	### Step 2: seek help from a security team and track funds	COMMENT
LOW⚡	academy/user_awareness/06_Report_stolen/en/readme.md	119	### Step 3: Count the amount of your stolen funds and keep related evidence	COMMENT
LOW⚡	academy/user_awareness/06_Report_stolen/en/readme.md	123	### Step 4: report the case to the law enforcement agency	COMMENT
LOW⚡	academy/user_awareness/06_Report_stolen/en/readme.md	127	### Step 5: continue to follow up and maintain communication	COMMENT

Hallucination Indicators2 hits · 20 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
CRITICAL	test.py	498	mock_open.return_value.__enter__.return_value.write.assert_called_with("Updated README")	CODE
CRITICAL	test.py	704	mock_open.return_value.__enter__.return_value.write.assert_called_with("Modified template content")	CODE

Over-Commented Block4 hits · 4 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/ja/readme.md	181		COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/ko/readme.md	181	import "forge-std/Test.sol";	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/es/readme.md	181	// Attack Contract : 0xc30808d9373093fbfcec9e026457c6a9dab706a7	COMMENT
LOW	…ademy/onchain_debug/03_write_your_own_poc/en/readme.md	181	// Attacker : 0xee0221d76504aec40f63ad7e36855eebf5ea5edd	COMMENT

Unused Imports7 hits · 4 pts

Severity	File	Line	Context
LOW	add_new_entry.py	16	CODE
LOW	test.py	11	CODE
LOW	test.py	12	CODE
LOW	test.py	13	CODE
LOW	test.py	17	CODE
LOW	test.py	18	CODE
LOW	test.py	23	CODE

Deep Nesting4 hits · 2 pts

Severity	File	Line	Context
LOW	add_new_entry.py	361	CODE
LOW	add_new_entry.py	454	CODE
LOW	test.py	870	CODE
LOW	test.py	916	CODE

Analysis Overview

What These Metrics Mean

Score History

Severity Breakdown

Directory Score Breakdown

Pattern Findings