Repository Analysis

PLFJY/ContextMenuMgr

A powerful utility that help you manage you context menu on Windows and avoid third party to add rubbish to your context menu.

3.3 Likely human-written View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of PLFJY/ContextMenuMgr, a C# project with 2,896 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 88,961 lines of code across 263 source files, recording 240 pattern matches distributed across 5 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 3.3 places this repository in the Likely human-written band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

3.3
Adjusted Score
3.3
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-11
Last Push
2.9K
Stars
C#
Language
89.0K
Lines of Code
263
Files
240
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.05
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 12HIGH 0MEDIUM 1LOW 227

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 240 distinct pattern matches across 5 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Over-Commented Block211 hits · 138 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWContextMenuMgr.Tests/ExternalChangeStateMachineTests.cs1using ContextMenuMgr.Backend.Services;COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.Tests/ExternalChangeStateMachineTests.cs441 /// <summary>COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.Tests/ExternalChangeStateMachineTests.cs701/// <summary>COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp21#include <algorithm> // all_of, find, for_eachCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp41// SPDX-License-Identifier: MITCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp61 #if defined(NLOHMANN_JSON_VERSION_MAJOR) && defined(NLOHMANN_JSON_VERSION_MINOR) && defined(NLOHMANN_JSON_VERSION_PACOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp81 #define JSON_USE_LEGACY_DISCARDED_VALUE_COMPARISON 0COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp161// __ _____ _____ _____COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp181#include <type_traits> // is_arithmetic, is_same, is_enum, underlying_type, is_convertibleCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp201#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp221COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp241// SPDX-License-Identifier: MITCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp341// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2016 - 2021 Evan Nemerson <evan@nemerson.com>COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp361#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp381#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp401#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp421COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp441 #define JSON_HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION_CHECK(major,minor,patch) (_MSC_FULL_VER >= ((major * 1000000) + (minor * 10000) + (COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp461 #define JSON_HEDLEY_INTEL_VERSION_CHECK(major,minor,patch) (0)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp481 #undef JSON_HEDLEY_PGI_VERSIONCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp501#elif defined(__SUNPRO_C)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp521#if defined(__EMSCRIPTEN__)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp541#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp561#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp581 )COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp601#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp621#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp641 #define JSON_HEDLEY_TI_ARMCL_VERSION_CHECK(major,minor,patch) (0)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp661 #undef JSON_HEDLEY_TI_CL7X_VERSIONCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp681#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp701#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp721#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp741#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp761 #define JSON_HEDLEY_DMC_VERSION_CHECK(major,minor,patch) (0)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp781 #undef JSON_HEDLEY_PELLES_VERSIONCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp801#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp841#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp861#elseCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp881 #define JSON_HEDLEY_HAS_CPP_ATTRIBUTE(attribute) __has_cpp_attribute(attribute)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp901#if defined(JSON_HEDLEY_GNUC_HAS_CPP_ATTRIBUTE)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp921#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp941 #define JSON_HEDLEY_GCC_HAS_BUILTIN(builtin,major,minor,patch) __has_builtin(builtin)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp961 #define JSON_HEDLEY_GNUC_HAS_FEATURE(feature,major,minor,patch) JSON_HEDLEY_GNUC_VERSION_CHECK(major,minor,patch)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp981COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1001 #undef JSON_HEDLEY_HAS_DECLSPEC_ATTRIBUTECOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1021#if defined(__has_declspec_attribute)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1041#elseCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1081 #undef JSON_HEDLEY_DIAGNOSTIC_PUSHCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1101 #define JSON_HEDLEY_DIAGNOSTIC_PUSH _Pragma("push")COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1141 xpr \COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1161# define JSON_HEDLEY_CONST_CAST(T, expr) (const_cast<T>(expr))COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1181#elseCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1201 _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wold-style-cast\"") \COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1221#elif JSON_HEDLEY_INTEL_VERSION_CHECK(13,0,0)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1241 (JSON_HEDLEY_TI_CL430_VERSION_CHECK(4,0,0) && defined(__TI_GNU_ATTRIBUTE_SUPPORT__)) || \COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1261 #undef JSON_HEDLEY_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNKNOWN_PRAGMASCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1281#elif JSON_HEDLEY_TI_CL6X_VERSION_CHECK(8,0,0)COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1301 #define JSON_HEDLEY_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNKNOWN_CPP_ATTRIBUTES __pragma(warning(disable:1292))COMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1321#endifCOMMENT
LOWContextMenuMgr.ProbeHost/third_party/nlohmann/json.hpp1341#elif JSON_HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(3,4,0)COMMENT
151 more matches not shown…
Hallucination Indicators12 hits · 120 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
CRITICAL…enuMgr.Frontend/ViewModels/SpecialMenuPageViewModel.cs339 await System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeAsync(() =>CODE
CRITICAL…enuMgr.Frontend/ViewModels/SpecialMenuPageViewModel.cs1161 System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() =>CODE
CRITICAL…enuMgr.Frontend/ViewModels/SpecialMenuPageViewModel.cs1293 await System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeAsync(() =>CODE
CRITICAL…enuMgr.Frontend/ViewModels/SpecialMenuPageViewModel.cs1318 await System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeAsync(() => ShowDocumentIconProvider = false);CODE
CRITICALContextMenuMgr.Frontend/ViewModels/MainViewModel.cs340 System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => Notifications.Remove(notification));CODE
CRITICALContextMenuMgr.Frontend/ViewModels/MainViewModel.cs408 System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() =>CODE
CRITICAL…ontrols/Modern/Navigation/ModernNavigationView.xaml.cs520 Transition.None => new ContextMenuMgr.Frontend.Controls.Modern.Frame.SuppressNavigationTransitionInfo(),CODE
CRITICAL…ontrols/Modern/Navigation/ModernNavigationView.xaml.cs521 Transition.FadeIn => new ContextMenuMgr.Frontend.Controls.Modern.Frame.FadeNavigationTransitionInfo(),CODE
CRITICAL…ontrols/Modern/Navigation/ModernNavigationView.xaml.cs534 _ => new ContextMenuMgr.Frontend.Controls.Modern.Frame.EntranceNavigationTransitionInfo()CODE
CRITICAL…nuMgr.Frontend/Services/ContextMenuWorkspaceService.cs458 await System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeAsync(CODE
CRITICAL…nuMgr.Frontend/Services/ContextMenuWorkspaceService.cs466 await System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeAsync(CODE
CRITICAL…nuMgr.Frontend/Services/ContextMenuWorkspaceService.cs1243 System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() =>CODE
Verbosity Indicators8 hits · 16 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs857 // Step 1: create a valid backup of the CURRENTLY recreated key.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs861 // Step 2: delete the recreated registry key.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs864 // Step 3: now that the new backup is safe, remove the superseded old backup.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs872 // Step 4: update state. The item is deleted again with the new backup.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs1927 // Step 1: disable the newly detected item immediately. This keeps theCOMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs1950 // Step 2: persist the blocked state and mark it as waiting for approval.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs2127 // Step 1: disable the recreated item immediately.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs2133 // Step 2: mark as pending approval while PRESERVING deletion provenance.COMMENT
Structural Annotation Overuse8 hits · 16 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs857 // Step 1: create a valid backup of the CURRENTLY recreated key.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs861 // Step 2: delete the recreated registry key.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs864 // Step 3: now that the new backup is safe, remove the superseded old backup.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs872 // Step 4: update state. The item is deleted again with the new backup.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs1927 // Step 1: disable the newly detected item immediately. This keeps theCOMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs1950 // Step 2: persist the blocked state and mark it as waiting for approval.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs2127 // Step 1: disable the recreated item immediately.COMMENT
LOW…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryCatalog.cs2133 // Step 2: mark as pending approval while PRESERVING deletion provenance.COMMENT
Modern AI Meta-Vocabulary1 hit · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUM…MenuMgr.Backend/Services/ContextMenuRegistryMonitor.cs5// Timed polling keeps the scaffold simple while still showing how the service canCOMMENT