AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

LibChecker/LibChecker

Name: LibChecker/LibChecker — Kotlin Code Quality & Security Review | AI Slop Code Risk Monitor
Creator: AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

An app to view libraries used in apps in your device.

1.0 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for LibChecker/LibChecker, a Kotlin project with 7,296 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 136,271 lines of code across 1415 source files, recording 25 pattern matches distributed across 3 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 1.0 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

1.0

Adjusted Signal

1.0

Raw Pattern Score

100%

Time Factor

2026-10-31

Last Push

7.3K

Stars

Kotlin

Language

136.3K

Lines of Code

1.4K

Files

Pattern Hits

2026-10-31

Scan Date

0.01

HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 0.6/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 15 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 4.1/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 10 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 0.5/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 14 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 4.1/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 25 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal: Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score: Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor: A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits: Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate: High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files: Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 10HIGH 0MEDIUM 0LOW 15

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 25 distinct pattern matches across 3 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Hallucination Indicators10 hits · 115 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
CRITICAL⚡	…ference/ui/view/LibReferenceTreemapInstrumentedTest.kt	547	androidx.core.view.ViewCompat.getRootWindowInsets(fragment.requireView())?.isVisible(androidx.core.view.WindowIn	CODE
CRITICAL⚡	…ference/ui/view/LibReferenceTreemapInstrumentedTest.kt	553	androidx.core.view.WindowCompat.getInsetsController(activity.window, fragment.requireView()).hide(androidx.core.	CODE
CRITICAL⚡	…ference/ui/view/LibReferenceTreemapInstrumentedTest.kt	556	androidx.core.view.ViewCompat.getRootWindowInsets(fragment.requireView())?.isVisible(androidx.core.view.WindowIn	CODE
CRITICAL	…ngs/ui/FloatingNavigationPreferenceInstrumentedTest.kt	105	val nav = com.absinthe.libchecker.view.app.FloatingBottomNavigationView(context)	CODE
CRITICAL	…main/statistics/chart/ui/StatisticCatalogEditorView.kt	249	private val progress = com.google.android.material.progressindicator.CircularProgressIndicator(context).apply {	CODE
CRITICAL	…stics/chart/source/impl/PageSize16KBChartDataSource.kt	70	if (com.absinthe.libraries.utils.utils.UiUtils.isDarkMode()) {	CODE
CRITICAL	…ain/statistics/chart/source/impl/ABIChartDataSource.kt	56	if (com.absinthe.libraries.utils.utils.UiUtils.isDarkMode()) {	CODE
CRITICAL	…e/libchecker/domain/snapshot/album/ui/AlbumActivity.kt	257	dialog = com.absinthe.libchecker.utils.UiUtils.createLoadingDialog(this@AlbumActivity)	CODE
CRITICAL	build-logic/src/main/kotlin/ResoptPlugin.kt	115	it.config.onlyDensityAndVersion() && it.value.item.file.path.endsWith(".xml")	CODE
CRITICAL	build-logic/src/main/kotlin/ResoptPlugin.kt	121	value.config.onlyDensityAndVersion() && value.value.item.file.path.endsWith(".png")	CODE

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers14 hits · 14 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	.github/scripts/sync_latest_stable_metadata.py	46	def version_code_from_asset_name(name, flavor):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/verify_apk_resources.py	19	def without_redundant_rasters(dump, min_sdk):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_build_telegram_payload.py	16	def test_builds_media_group_payload(self):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_build_telegram_payload.py	27	def test_builds_message_payload(self):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_generate_apk_size_chart.py	27	def test_uses_legacy_app_then_foss_flavor(self):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_generate_apk_size_chart.py	100	def test_splits_large_history_without_dropping_commits(self):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_generate_apk_size_chart.py	118	def test_rejects_invalid_pending_metadata(self):	CODE
LOW	…thub/scripts/tests/test_sync_latest_stable_metadata.py	18	def test_updates_outdated_stable_metadata_with_market_flavor(self):	CODE
LOW	…thub/scripts/tests/test_sync_latest_stable_metadata.py	85	def test_skips_current_stable_metadata(self):	CODE
LOW	…thub/scripts/tests/test_build_telegram_notification.py	22	def test_long_commit_message_is_summarized_under_caption_limit(self):	CODE
LOW	…thub/scripts/tests/test_build_telegram_notification.py	37	def test_long_commit_subject_is_truncated_under_caption_limit(self):	CODE
LOW	…thub/scripts/tests/test_build_telegram_notification.py	51	def test_escapes_html_from_commit_and_author(self):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_read_apk_info.py	17	def test_reads_foss_and_market_metadata(self):	CODE
LOW	.github/scripts/tests/test_write_assets_metadata.py	16	def test_builds_stable_metadata_with_market_flavor(self):	CODE

Deep Nesting1 hit · 1 pts

Severity	File	Line	Snippet	Context
LOW	.github/scripts/verify_apk_resources.py	36		CODE