Repository Analysis

KeygraphHQ/shannon

Shannon is an autonomous, white-box AI pentester for web applications and APIs. It analyzes your source code, identifies attack vectors, and executes real exploits to prove vulnerabilities before they reach production.

3.6 Likely human-written View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of KeygraphHQ/shannon, a TypeScript project with 45,671 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 32,345 lines of code across 173 source files, recording 72 pattern matches distributed across 5 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 3.6 places this repository in the Likely human-written band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

3.6
Adjusted Score
3.6
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-04
Last Push
45.7K
Stars
TypeScript
Language
32.3K
Lines of Code
173
Files
72
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.05
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 8MEDIUM 0LOW 64

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 72 distinct pattern matches across 5 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Structural Annotation Overuse27 hits · 40 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOW.claude/commands/debug.md7## Step 1: Capture Error ContextCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/debug.md20## Step 2: Check Relevant LogsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/debug.md35## Step 3: Trace the Call PathCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/debug.md50## Step 4: Identify Root CauseCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/debug.md90## Step 5: Apply Fix with Retry LimitCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/debug.md99## Step 6: Validate the FixCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/review.md7## Step 1: Gather ChangesCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/review.md14## Step 2: Check Shannon-Specific PatternsCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/review.md66## Step 3: TypeScript SafetyCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/review.md83## Step 4: Security ReviewCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/review.md95## Step 5: Common Mistakes to AvoidCOMMENT
LOW.claude/commands/review.md112## Step 6: Provide FeedbackCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-authz.txt7### Step 1: Test Browser IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-authz.txt23### Step 2: Create Required DeliverableCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-authz.txt31### Step 3: Verify Session IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-ssrf.txt7### Step 1: Test Browser IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-ssrf.txt23### Step 2: Create Required DeliverableCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-ssrf.txt31### Step 3: Verify Session IsolationCOMMENT
LOW…/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-injection.txt7### Step 1: Test Browser IsolationCOMMENT
LOW…/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-injection.txt23### Step 2: Create Required DeliverableCOMMENT
LOW…/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-injection.txt31### Step 3: Verify Session IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-xss.txt7### Step 1: Test Browser IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-xss.txt23### Step 2: Create Required DeliverableCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-xss.txt31### Step 3: Verify Session IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-auth.txt7### Step 1: Test Browser IsolationCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-auth.txt23### Step 2: Create Required DeliverableCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/prompts/pipeline-testing/exploit-auth.txt31### Step 3: Verify Session IsolationCOMMENT
Magic Placeholder Names8 hits · 40 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHllms-full.txt296ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-api-keyCODE
HIGHllms-full.txt303export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="your-api-key"CODE
HIGHllms-full.txt587export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-api-keyCODE
HIGHllms-full.txt593ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-api-keyCODE
HIGHdocs/ai-providers.md16export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-api-keyCODE
HIGHdocs/ai-providers.md22ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-api-keyCODE
HIGHdocs/development.md35ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-api-keyCODE
HIGHdocs/development.md42export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="your-api-key"CODE
Hyper-Verbose Identifiers30 hits · 30 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWapps/cli/src/env.ts69function isCustomBaseUrlConfigured(): boolean {CODE
LOWapps/cli/src/commands/setup.ts289async function maybePromptAdaptiveThinking(config: ShannonConfig): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWapps/cli/src/commands/start.ts36function migrateLegacyWorkspaceLayout(workspacePath: string): void {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/worker.ts173async function terminateExistingWorkflows(client: Client, workspaceName: string): Promise<string[]> {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts299async function runVulnAgentWithCollector(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts369async function runExploitAgentWithCollector(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts510export async function runAuthenticationValidation(input: ActivityInput): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts627export async function syncPlaywrightStealthConfig(input: ActivityInput): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts694export async function injectReportMetadataActivity(input: ActivityInput): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts856export async function persistOrValidateRunScope(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/temporal/activities.ts1134export async function generateReportOutputActivity(input: ActivityInput): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/mcp-server/recon-collector.ts592export function createReconCollectorServer(): ReconCollectorServer {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/mcp-server/pre-recon-collector.ts460export function createPreReconCollectorServer(): PreReconCollectorServer {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/utils/billing-detection.ts53export function matchesBillingTextPattern(text: string): boolean {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/audit/utils.ts33export function generateSessionIdentifier(sessionMetadata: SessionMetadata): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/ai/playwright-config-writer.ts77export async function writePlaywrightStealthConfig(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/ai/settings-writer.ts24export async function writeUserSettingsForCodePathAvoids(config: DistributedConfig | null): Promise<void> {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/container.ts128export function getOrCreateContainer(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/git-manager.ts118export async function executeGitCommandWithRetry(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/prompt-manager.ts60function renderVulnSummarySubsections(selected: readonly VulnClass[]): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/vuln-renderer.ts150function renderStrategicIntelligence(vulnClass: VulnClass, intel: StrategicIntelligenceInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts94function renderExecutiveSummarySection(data: ExecutiveSummaryInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts101function renderArchitectureSection(intel: ApplicationIntelligenceInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts137function renderDataSecuritySection(intel: ApplicationIntelligenceInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts151function renderAttackSurfaceSection(intel: ApplicationIntelligenceInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts166function renderInfrastructureSection(intel: ApplicationIntelligenceInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts185function renderCodebaseIndexingSection(data: CodebaseIndexingInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/pre-recon-renderer.ts192function renderCriticalFilePathsSection(paths: CriticalFilePathsInput | undefined): string {CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/queue-validation.ts284export async function validateQueueAndDeliverable(CODE
LOWapps/worker/src/services/recon-renderer.ts291function renderEntityMetadataTable(entities: readonly Entity[]): string {CODE
Over-Commented Block4 hits · 4 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWapps/worker/configs/example-config.yaml1# Example configuration file for pentest-agentCOMMENT
LOWapps/worker/configs/example-config.yaml21# - Throttle to under 5 requests per second per endpoint. Back off 60 seconds on any 429 response.COMMENT
LOWapps/worker/configs/example-config.yaml81 value: "beta-admin"COMMENT
LOWapps/worker/configs/example-config.yaml101# guidance: |COMMENT
Fake / Example Data3 hits · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsample-reports/shannon-report-crapi.md57 -d '{"email": "admin@example.com", "password": "Admin!123"}'CODE
LOWsample-reports/shannon-report-crapi.md139 -d '{"email": "admin@example.com", "password": "Admin!123"}'CODE
LOWsample-reports/shannon-report-crapi.md242 - Payload: `{"sub": "admin@example.com", "iat": 1758655244, "exp": 1759260044, "role": "admin"}`CODE