Repository Analysis

DapperLib/Dapper

Dapper - a simple object mapper for .Net

4.2 Likely human-written View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of DapperLib/Dapper, a C# project with 18,348 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 28,592 lines of code across 192 source files, recording 130 pattern matches distributed across 3 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 4.2 places this repository in the Likely human-written band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

4.2
Adjusted Score
4.2
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-05-16
Last Push
18.3K
Stars
C#
Language
28.6K
Lines of Code
192
Files
130
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.01
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 1MEDIUM 0LOW 129

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 130 distinct pattern matches across 3 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Over-Commented Block127 hits · 112 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWbenchmarks/Dapper.Tests.Performance/LegacyTests.cs421 // {COMMENT
LOWDapper.ProviderTools/BulkCopy.cs81COMMENT
LOWDapper.ProviderTools/BulkCopy.cs101 [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessage("ApiDesign", "RS0026:Do not add multiple public overloads with COMMENT
LOWDapper.ProviderTools/BulkCopy.cs121 /// <summary>COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/cla.yml21 uses: contributor-assistant/github-action@v2.3.0COMMENT
LOW.github/workflows/cla.yml41 #custom-allsigned-prcomment: 'pull request comment when all contributors has signed, defaults to **CLA AssistaCOMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.cs361 /// <param name="sql">The SQL to execute.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.cs381 /// </summary>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.cs401 /// <typeparam name="TSecond">The second type in the recordset.</typeparam>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.cs421 /// <typeparam name="TThird">The third type in the recordset.</typeparam>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.cs441 /// <typeparam name="TThird">The third type in the recordset.</typeparam>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.cs461 /// <param name="buffered">Whether the results should be buffered in memory.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs61 /// <summary>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs81 database.QueryAsync<T>("select * from " + TableName);COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs101 _connection.QueryAsync<T>(sql, param as object, Transaction, _commandTimeout);COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs121 /// <param name="map">The function to map row types to the return type.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs141 /// <param name="param">The parameters to use for this query.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs161 /// <param name="param">The parameters to use for this query.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs181 /// <param name="map">The function to map row types to the return type.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper.Rainbow/Database.Async.cs201 /// Execute a command that returns multiple result sets, and access each in turn.COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.Identity.cs141 }COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.Identity.cs161#pragma warning restore CS0618 // Type or member is obsoleteCOMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.Identity.cs181 [Obsolete("Please use " + nameof(GetHashCode) + ". This API may be removed at a later date.")]COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.Identity.cs221 /// </summary>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.Identity.cs241 /// <summary>COMMENT
LOWDapper/DynamicParameters.cs321COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs341 /// Configure the specified type to be processed by a custom handler.COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs561 }COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs581 public static object? ExecuteScalar(this IDbConnection cnn, string sql, object? param = null, IDbTransaction? trCOMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs601 return ExecuteScalarImpl<T>(cnn, ref command);COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs701 /// <returns>An <see cref="IDataReader"/> that can be used to iterate over the results of the SQL query.</returnCOMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs721 return DbWrappedReader.Create(dbcmd, reader);COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs741 /// Execute parameterized SQL and return an <see cref="IDataReader"/>.COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs761 /// <param name="sql">The SQL to execute for the query.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs781 /// <remarks>Note: the row can be accessed via "dynamic", or by casting to an IDictionary&lt;string,object&gt;</COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs801 /// Return a dynamic object with properties matching the columns.COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs821 /// <param name="commandTimeout">The command timeout (in seconds).</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs841 /// created per row, and a direct column-name===member-name mapping is assumed (case insensitive).COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs861 /// <returns>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs881 /// <param name="commandType">The type of command to execute.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs901 /// <param name="commandTimeout">The command timeout (in seconds).</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs921 /// <param name="transaction">The transaction to use, if any.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs941 /// <param name="param">The parameters to pass, if any.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs961 /// Executes a single-row query, returning the data typed as <paramref name="type"/>.COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs981 }COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1001 if (type is null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(type));COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1021 [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessage("ApiDesign", "RS0026:Do not add multiple public overloads with COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1041 /// A sequence of data of the supplied type; if a basic type (int, string, etc) is queried then the data from thCOMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1061 /// </returns>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1081 /// <summary>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1101 /// A single instance of the supplied type; if a basic type (int, string, etc) is queried then the data from theCOMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1121 /// Execute a command that returns multiple result sets, and access each in turn.COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1401 catch (Exception ex)COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1421 /// <param name="param">The parameters to use for this query.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1441 /// <param name="sql">The SQL to execute for this query.</param>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1461 /// <typeparam name="TFourth">The fourth type in the recordset.</typeparam>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1481 /// <typeparam name="TFirst">The first type in the recordset.</typeparam>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1501 /// <summary>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1521 /// <returns>An enumerable of <typeparamref name="TReturn"/>.</returns>COMMENT
LOWDapper/SqlMapper.cs1541 /// <param name="param">The parameters to use for this query.</param>COMMENT
67 more matches not shown…
Synthetic Comment Markers1 hit · 8 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGH…per.Tests.Performance/Linq2Sql/DataClasses.designer.cs5// This code was generated by a tool.COMMENT
Fake / Example Data2 hits · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWDapper.Rainbow/readme.md69var newUser = new User { Name = "John Doe", Email = "john.doe@example.com" };CODE
LOWDapper.Rainbow/readme.md112var newUser = new User { Name = "Jane Doe", Email = "jane.doe@example.com" };CODE