Repository Analysis

CookSleep/gpt_image_playground

基于 OpenAI gpt-image-2 API 的图片生成与编辑工具

4.6 Likely human-written View on GitHub

Analysis Overview

This report presents the forensic synthetic code analysis of CookSleep/gpt_image_playground, a TypeScript project with 3,012 GitHub stars. SynthScan v2.0 examined 45,401 lines of code across 125 source files, recording 221 pattern matches distributed across 3 syntactic categories. The overall adjusted score of 4.6 places this repository in the Likely human-written band.

The scanner applied 160+ deterministic lexical heuristics, multi-line block detectors, abstract syntax tree depth profilers, and a cross-file Jaccard similarity matrix to construct a statistically normalised synthetic code estimate. All matches are individually weighted by severity coefficient and contextual multiplier before summation, and the resulting headline score is temporally discounted to account for the repository's development history relative to the commercial emergence of large language model coding tooling (November 2022 onward).

4.6
Adjusted Score
4.6
Raw Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-07-14
Last Push
3.0K
Stars
TypeScript
Language
45.4K
Lines of Code
125
Files
221
Pattern Hits
2026-07-14
Scan Date
0.00
HC Hit Rate

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Score
Primary synthetic code indicator. Raw score normalised per 1,000 lines of code and multiplied by the temporal discount factor. This is the definitive comparative metric — use it to rank repositories by AI authorship density.
Raw Score
The unmodified sum of all severity-weighted, context-multiplied pattern match scores before temporal discounting. Reflects the absolute signal strength independent of when the repository was last active.
Time Factor
The temporal discount multiplier (0–100%) applied to the raw score. Repositories last updated before ChatGPT's launch (Nov 2022) receive a 5% factor. Full signal is only assigned to repositories active in the post-adoption era (Jan 2024+).
Pattern Hits
Total count of individual pattern matches across all files and categories. A high hit count with a low score may indicate a very large codebase with isolated AI snippets; a low count with a high score indicates dense, concentrated AI signatures.
HC Hit Rate
High+Critical pattern hits per file, averaged across the repository. This orthogonal signal catches repositories where a few files are densely packed with high-severity AI tells — a strong indicator even when the normalised score appears moderate due to codebase size.
Lines of Code / Files
Total lines and files analysed. The scanner examines 94 file extensions. These denominators are used to normalise the score, enabling fair comparison between repositories of vastly different sizes.

Score History

This chart maps the temporal evolution of the adjusted synthetic code score across successive scan runs. An upward trajectory indicates ongoing incorporation of AI-generated code or expanding LLM-assisted scaffolding; a stable or declining trajectory may reflect active human refactoring, code removal, or the adoption of stricter authorship policies. The dashed secondary line (right axis) independently tracks total raw pattern hit count, which can diverge from the normalised score when codebase size changes significantly between scans.

Severity Breakdown

Classifies detected patterns by their diagnostic confidence and structural impact. CRITICAL patterns (coefficient 10) represent definitive synthetic signatures — hallucinated imports, explicit LLM attribution metadata — virtually never produced by human authors. HIGH (5) indicates strong structural tells such as cross-file repetition or cross-linguistic idioms. MEDIUM (2) covers recognisable conversational padding and AI-specific vocabulary. LOW (1) captures subtle indicators like tautological comments and generic boilerplate that require density to carry independent signal.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 0MEDIUM 1LOW 220

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart decomposes the repository's raw synthetic code score by top-level directory, allowing you to pinpoint precisely which modules or components carry the highest AI authorship density. Directories with disproportionately high scores relative to their size warrant targeted manual review: concentrated AI signatures often trace back to mass-generated configuration layers, auto-ported test suites, LLM-scaffolded boilerplate classes, or entire subsystems authored under heavy copilot assistance. Use this view to prioritise your human code-review effort.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 221 distinct pattern matches across 3 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a statistically significant AI authorship indicator. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the diagnostic confidence level (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 weight because LLMs systematically over-annotate. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier as dense clusters constitute far stronger evidence of synthetic authorship than isolated hits.

Hyper-Verbose Identifiers219 hits · 204 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWsrc/store.ts350function showTaskCompletionNotification(title: string, body: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts356function countSuccessfulOutputImages(tasks: TaskRecord[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts360function skipSupportPromptForImportedData(tasks: TaskRecord[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts579function normalizeFavoriteCollectionName(value: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts583function createDefaultFavoriteCollection(now = Date.now()): FavoriteCollection {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts592function normalizeFavoriteCollections(value: unknown): FavoriteCollection[] {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts615function ensureDefaultFavoriteCollection(collections: FavoriteCollection[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts621function ensureDefaultNamedCollection(collections: FavoriteCollection[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts626function getDefaultNamedFavoriteCollectionId(collections: FavoriteCollection[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts632function resolveDefaultFavoriteCollectionId(collections: FavoriteCollection[], preferredId: unknown) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1094function getPersistableGalleryInputDraft(state: AppState) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1098function restoreGalleryInputDraftState(draft: AgentInputDraft | null): Pick<AgentInputDraft, 'prompt' | 'inputImages' | CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1108function restoreAgentInputDraftState(drafts: Record<string, AgentInputDraft>, conversationId: string | null): Pick<AgentCODE
LOWsrc/store.ts2481function getAgentRoundControllerKey(conversationId: string, roundId: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts2489function createAgentRecoveryPauseError() {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts2495function isAgentRecoveryPauseError(err: unknown) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts2499function appendAgentStoppedMessage(content: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts2506function markAgentRoundTasksStopped(conversationId: string, roundId: string, now = Date.now()) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts3024function truncateAgentReferencePrompt(prompt: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts3029function createAgentAssistantFallbackItem(text: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts3036function parseResponseOutputFromPayload(rawResponsePayload?: string): ResponsesOutputItem[] | null {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts3046function sanitizeResponseOutputItemForInput(item: ResponsesOutputItem): unknown | null {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts4913function normalizeFavoriteCollectionIds(ids: unknown) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts4918function sameFavoriteCollectionIds(a: string[], b: string[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts4924export function getTaskFavoriteCollectionIds(task: TaskRecord) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts4931function normalizeTaskFavoriteState(task: TaskRecord, collections: FavoriteCollection[]): TaskRecord {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts200export async function ensureImageThumbnailCached(id: string): Promise<{ dataUrl: string; width?: number; height?: numberCODE
LOWsrc/store.ts237function scheduleThumbnailBackfill(ids: Iterable<string>, priority: 'visible' | 'background' = 'background') {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts246function scheduleThumbnailBackfillTick() {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts262async function processNextThumbnailBackfill() {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts271async function getNextThumbnailBackfillBatch() {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts285function getOrderedThumbnailBackfillIds() {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts295function getThumbnailConcurrencyForBatch(sizes: Array<{ width?: number; height?: number }>) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts372function showSupportPromptForExistingLocalData(tasks: TaskRecord[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts457function normalizeAgentConversations(value: unknown): AgentConversation[] {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts492function mergeImportedAgentConversations(current: AgentConversation[], imported: AgentConversation[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts509function mergeAgentConversationsForStorage(stored: AgentConversation[], legacy: AgentConversation[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts521function getPersistableResponseOutputItem(item: ResponsesOutputItem): ResponsesOutputItem {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts539function getPersistableAgentConversations(conversations: AgentConversation[]): AgentConversation[] {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts552function stripPersistedAgentConversations(value: unknown): unknown {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts651function createAgentConversationTitle(prompt: string, fallbackTitle: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts663function getLatestAgentConversation(conversations: AgentConversation[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts704async function replaceStoredAgentConversations(conversations: AgentConversation[]) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts708function getPersistableAgentConversation(conversation: AgentConversation): AgentConversation {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts957export async function deleteImageIfUnreferenced(imageId: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1007function normalizeAgentInputDrafts(value: unknown, conversations: AgentConversation[]): Record<string, AgentInputDraft> CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1019function normalizeAgentInputDraftsByKey(value: unknown): Record<string, AgentInputDraft> {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1029export function cleanStaleAgentInputDrafts(drafts: Record<string, AgentInputDraft>, activeConversationId: string | null,CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1059function getCurrentAgentInputDraft(state: Pick<AppState, 'prompt' | 'inputImages' | 'maskDraft' | 'maskEditorImageId'>):CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1083function saveActiveAgentInputDrafts(state: Pick<AppState, 'appMode' | 'activeAgentConversationId' | 'agentInputDrafts' |CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1136function getPersistableAgentInputDrafts(state: AppState) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1638async function flushAgentConversationsToIndexedDB() {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1673function getPersistableRawResponsePayload(rawResponsePayload?: string) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1709function isAsyncCustomProviderTask(settings: AppSettings, provider: string, hasInputImages: boolean) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1716export function markInterruptedOpenAIRunningTasks(tasks: TaskRecord[], now = Date.now()) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1742function failOpenAITaskIfStillRunning(taskId: string, error: string, now = Date.now()) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1771function usesConcurrentOpenAIImageRequests(profile: ApiProfile, params: TaskParams) {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1844function createSettingsForApiProfile(settings: AppSettings, profile: ApiProfile): AppSettings {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1860function getAgentProfileValidationError(settings: AppSettings): { profile: ApiProfile | null; message: string } | null {CODE
LOWsrc/store.ts1888function isNetworkRecoverableError(err: unknown) {CODE
159 more matches not shown…
AI Slop Vocabulary1 hit · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMpackage-lock.json6050 "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/robust-predicates/-/robust-predicates-3.0.3.tgz",CODE
TODO Padding1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWAGENTS.md36- 不要留 `// TODO: implement later`、`// ...` 或 stub 函数。CODE