AI Slop Code RIsk Monitor

BurntSushi/toml

TOML parser for Golang with reflection.

5.0 Moderate pattern signal View on GitHub

Maintenance and Governance Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for BurntSushi/toml, a Go project with 5,018 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 19,325 lines of code across 1083 source files, recording 42 pattern matches distributed across 4 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 5.0 (Moderate pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

5.0
Adjusted Signal
5.0
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-08-18
Last Push
5.0K
Stars
Go
Language
19.3K
Lines of Code
1.1K
Files
42
Pattern Hits
2026-10-12
Scan Date
0.01
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · v3

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 9.4/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 30 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.0/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 0 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 13.9/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 12 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 25.4/100 · MEDIUM

Which changes need focused human review? 42 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 11MEDIUM 8LOW 23

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 42 distinct pattern matches across 4 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Cross-File Repetition11 hits · 55 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHinternal/toml-test/specs/v1.1.0.md0\ the quick brown \ fox jumps over \ the lazy dog.\STRING
HIGHinternal/toml-test/specs/v1.0.0.md0\ the quick brown \ fox jumps over \ the lazy dog.\STRING
HIGH…ternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.1.0/common-15.toml0\ the quick brown \ fox jumps over \ the lazy dog.\STRING
HIGHinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.0.0/string-3.toml0\ the quick brown \ fox jumps over \ the lazy dog.\STRING
HIGHinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/string/multiline.toml0\ the quick brown \ fox jumps over \ the lazy dog.\STRING
HIGHinternal/toml-test/specs/v1.1.0.md0# "this," she said, "is just a pointless statement." str7 =STRING
HIGHinternal/toml-test/specs/v1.0.0.md0# "this," she said, "is just a pointless statement." str7 =STRING
HIGH…ternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.1.0/common-16.toml0# "this," she said, "is just a pointless statement." str7 =STRING
HIGHinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.0.0/string-4.toml0# "this," she said, "is just a pointless statement." str7 =STRING
HIGH…al/toml-test/tests/invalid/spec-1.1.0/common-16-0.toml0# "this," she said, "is just a pointless statement." str7 =STRING
HIGH…nal/toml-test/tests/invalid/spec-1.0.0/string-4-0.toml0# "this," she said, "is just a pointless statement." str7 =STRING
Over-Commented Block23 hits · 23 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWencode.go81//COMMENT
LOWencode.go101//COMMENT
LOWencode.go701func (enc *Encoder) newline() {COMMENT
LOWerror.go1package tomlCOMMENT
LOWerror.go21// ^^^^^COMMENT
LOWerror.go41// # INVALIDCOMMENT
LOWlex.go721 /// Found " → try to read two more "".COMMENT
LOWdoc.go1// Package toml implements decoding and encoding of TOML files.COMMENT
LOWmeta.go61//COMMENT
LOWdecode.go61//COMMENT
LOWdecode.go81)COMMENT
LOWdecode.go101// booleans, datetimes) will be converted to a []byte and given to the value'sCOMMENT
LOWtoml_test.go101 plain_table."with.dot": IntegerCOMMENT
LOWtoml_test.go121 // in keys. This is to allow "redefining" tables, for example:COMMENT
LOWtoml_test.go141 albums.songs.name: StringCOMMENT
LOWinternal/tz.go1package internalCOMMENT
LOWinternal/tz.go21// encoding, encoding of comments, etc.COMMENT
LOWinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/comment/everywhere.toml1# Top comment.COMMENT
LOWinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/comment/noeol.toml1# single comment without any eol charactersCOMMENT
LOW…toml-test/tests/invalid/inline-table/overwrite-10.toml1# Set implicit "b", overwrite "b" (illegal!) and then set another implicit.COMMENT
LOW…/toml-test/tests/invalid/encoding/bad-utf8-at-end.toml1# There is a 0xda at after the quotes, and no EOL at the end of the file.COMMENT
LOW…st/tests/invalid/table/append-with-dotted-keys-01.toml1# First a.b.c defines a table: a.b.c = {z=9}COMMENT
LOW…rnal/toml-test/tests/invalid/table/array-implicit.toml1# This test is a bit tricky. It should fail because the first use ofCOMMENT
Slop Phrases7 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.1.0/common-8.toml4# So then you can add to the table "fruit" like so:COMMENT
MEDIUM…ternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.1.0/common-46.toml8[fruit.apple.texture] # you can add sub-tablesCODE
MEDIUMinternal/toml-test/tests/valid/spec-1.0.0/table-9.toml8[fruit.apple.texture] # you can add sub-tablesCODE
MEDIUM…al/toml-test/tests/invalid/spec-1.1.0/common-46-1.toml8[fruit.apple.texture] # you can add sub-tablesCODE
MEDIUM…al/toml-test/tests/invalid/spec-1.1.0/common-46-0.toml8[fruit.apple.texture] # you can add sub-tablesCODE
MEDIUM…rnal/toml-test/tests/invalid/spec-1.0.0/table-9-1.toml8[fruit.apple.texture] # you can add sub-tablesCODE
MEDIUM…rnal/toml-test/tests/invalid/spec-1.0.0/table-9-0.toml8[fruit.apple.texture] # you can add sub-tablesCODE
Decorative Section Separators1 hit · 3 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMencode.go714// ┌───────────────────┐COMMENT