AI Slop Code Risk Monitor

3proxy/3proxy

SlopCodeMonitor badge for 3proxy/3proxy Adjusted legacy signal; badge bands: 25 / 50 / 75 (different from dashboard bands).

3proxy - tiny free proxy server

3.0 Low pattern signal View on GitHub

Open-Source Code Quality, Security and Technical Debt Review

This report summarizes scanner evidence for 3proxy/3proxy, a C project with 5,566 GitHub stars. SynthScan examined 47,894 lines of code across 160 source files, recording 88 pattern matches distributed across 9 syntactic categories. The legacy adjusted pattern signal is 3.0 (Low pattern signal); it is not an authorship estimate.

Use the findings to ask whether maintainers can explain intent, verify dependencies, simplify unnecessary scaffolding, and focus review effort. Risk Payload v1 adds ownership, supply-chain, over-engineering, and review-effort vectors when available. These are prompts for human verification, not probabilities, security findings, or measured maintenance costs.

3.0
Adjusted Signal
3.0
Raw Pattern Score
100%
Time Factor
2026-10-31
Last Push
5.6K
Stars
C
Language
47.9K
Lines of Code
160
Files
88
Pattern Hits
2026-10-31
Scan Date
0.06
HC Hit Rate

Risk Review · Payload v1

Use each vector to guide manual verification of the underlying findings.

Payload schema: 1.0.0 · Engine: 2.0.0 · Scoring: heuristic-density-v1 · Scan date: 2026-10-31.

Cognitive Ownership Risk 6.9/100 · LOW

Can maintainers explain intent, assumptions, and trade-offs? 68 finding(s).

Hallucinated Dependency & Supply Chain Risk 0.1/100 · LOW

Are imports declared and package/API names verified? 1 finding(s).

Agent Over-Engineering Ratio 7.3/100 · LOW

Are wrappers, guards, and repeated structures necessary? 20 finding(s).

PR Review Velocity Impact 14.7/100 · LOW

Which changes need focused human review? 88 finding(s).

What These Metrics Mean

Adjusted Signal
Legacy pattern score normalized per 1,000 scanned lines and multiplied by the repository-level time factor. It is not an estimate of AI authorship.
Raw Pattern Score
Sum of severity- and context-weighted pattern findings before applying the time factor.
Time Factor
A coarse multiplier based on repository last-push metadata. It does not identify when individual code was written.
Pattern Hits
Count of configured pattern findings. Review each location and surrounding code before acting.
HC Hit Rate
High- and critical-severity findings per scanned file. Severity is a configured detector weight, not proof of a vulnerability or authorship.
Lines / Files
Scan coverage denominators used by the legacy normalized score.

Pattern-Signal History

This chart tracks the legacy adjusted pattern score across scan runs. Changes can reflect source changes, scan coverage, or detector/scoring versions; they do not measure AI adoption or prove that a team refactored code. Compare runs only when their scoring versions are compatible. The dashed line tracks the raw pattern-hit count.

Severity Breakdown

Groups findings by configured severity weight. Severity is not a confidence estimate, security rating, or proof that a package is missing. Verify imports against the project's manifests and inspect each finding in its local design context.

CRITICAL 0HIGH 10MEDIUM 7LOW 71

Directory Score Breakdown

This horizontal bar chart shows where configured pattern scores accumulate across directories. Treat the bars as locations to inspect, not as evidence of authorship or code quality. Use the file-level findings to decide whether a directory needs a focused ownership, dependency, complexity, or review check.

Pattern Findings

The scanner identified 88 distinct pattern matches across 9 syntactic categories. Each entry below represents a discrete location in the source code where the engine recorded a detector match to inspect in context. Expand any category row to inspect the individual file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and the lexical context (CODE, COMMENT, or STRING) in which each match was detected.

Reading the findings table: The Severity column indicates the configured finding weight (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). The Context column identifies whether the match occurred inside executable code, an inline comment, or a string literal — legacy comment-context matches receive a ×1.5 score weight. The ⚡ bolt icon marks clustered matches: three or more patterns within a 10-line window, each receiving an additional ×1.5 density multiplier under the legacy scoring model.

Over-Commented Block59 hits · 59 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWdoc/ru/example1.txt61logformat "%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S %U %C:%c %R:%r %O %I %T"COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.c1401#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/common.c61# define MYRAND_ARC4RANDOM 1COMMENT
LOWsrc/ssl.c1/*COMMENT
LOWsrc/ssl.c21#include <openssl/err.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/httpsrv.c21#include <sys/stat.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/httpsrv.c41#define RETURN(xxx) { param->res = xxx; goto CLEANRET; }COMMENT
LOWsrc/version.h1#ifndef VERSIONCOMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c61#ifdef PCRE2_DOTALLCOMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c81#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c101 {"PCRE2_UNGREEDY", PCRE2_UNGREEDY},COMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c121#ifdef PCRE2_LITERALCOMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c141 {"PCRE_ANCHORED", PCRE2_ANCHORED},COMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c161#ifdef PCRE2_UTFCOMMENT
LOWsrc/pcre.c181#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/sockmap.c21COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c21#define PW_TYPE_ABINARY 4COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c41#define PW_FRAMED_IP_NETMASK 9COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c61#define PW_CALLING_STATION_ID 31COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c81#define PW_NAS_PORT_TYPE 61COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c101#define PW_LOGIN_IPV6_HOST 98COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c121#define PW_SIMULTANEOUS_USE 1034COMMENT
LOWsrc/authradius.c141#define PW_FRAMED_USER 2COMMENT
LOWsrc/tcppm.c61#include "proxymain.c"COMMENT
LOWsrc/mdhash.c21#ifdef HAVE_BLAKE2BCOMMENT
LOWsrc/ssllib.c1/*COMMENT
LOWsrc/ssllib.c21#include <wolfssl/openssl/x509v3.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/ssl.h81 pending (SSL_has_pending(), OpenSSL 1.1.0 and later): poll() would waitCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h21#define NORADIUSCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h41COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h61#include <sys/uio.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h81#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h101#elseCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h121 taken only when there is no service.COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h181#include <sqltypes.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h201#define SOCKET_ERROR -1COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxy.h221#ifdef _TIME64_T_DEFINEDCOMMENT
LOWsrc/transparent.c21COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxymain.c161#define SO_PORT_SCALABILITY 0x3006COMMENT
LOWsrc/proxymain.c181#ifdef TCP_TIMESTAMPSCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxymain.c201#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxymain.c241#elseCOMMENT
LOWsrc/proxymain.c261 ADDFEATURE("transparent");COMMENT
LOWsrc/conf.c21#ifdef WITH_TRANSPARENTCOMMENT
LOWsrc/3proxy.c21#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h1/*COMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h21#ifdef __cplusplusCOMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h41#define _3proxy_mutex_init(x) pthread_mutex_init(x,NULL)COMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h61#ifdef MSVCCOMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h81#elseCOMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h101#endifCOMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h121#define REDIRECT 2COMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h141#define HTTP_CONNECT 0x00001000COMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h161#define UN_SAADDR(sa) (((struct sockaddr_un *)sa)->sun_family == AF_UNIX)? (unsigned char *)((struct sockaddr_un *)sa)->COMMENT
LOWsrc/structures.h181#define SASOCK(sa) ( UN_SASOCK(sa) ((struct sockaddr_in *)sa)->sin_family == AF_INET6? PF_INET6:PF_INET)COMMENT
LOWsrc/plugins/FilePlugin/FilePlugin.c1/*COMMENT
LOWsrc/plugins/FilePlugin/FilePlugin.c21#include <io.h>COMMENT
LOWsrc/plugins/FilePlugin/FilePlugin.h1#ifdef __cplusplusCOMMENT
LOWsrc/libs/blake2-impl.h21#if !defined(__cplusplus) && (!defined(__STDC_VERSION__) || __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901L)COMMENT
Empty Error Handlers7 hits · 35 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHtests/harness.py464except OSError:CODE
HIGHtests/harness.py905except (OSError, NameError, UnboundLocalError):CODE
HIGHtests/harness.py323except OSError:CODE
HIGHtests/harness.py454except OSError:CODE
HIGHtests/cases/ftppr.py42except OSError:CODE
HIGHtests/cases/portmap.py96except OSError:CODE
HIGHtests/cases/portmap.py23except OSError:CODE
Decorative Section Separators6 hits · 18 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
MEDIUMCMakeLists.txt414# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMCMakeLists.txt416# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMCMakeLists.txt440# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMCMakeLists.txt443# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMCMakeLists.txt494# ============================================================================COMMENT
MEDIUMCMakeLists.txt497# ============================================================================COMMENT
Cross-File Repetition3 hits · 15 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
HIGHtests/cases/parent_weights.py0log auth iponly allow * http echo * /echo** http echo * /safe/** httpsrv -p{srv}STRING
HIGHtests/cases/parent_failover.py0log auth iponly allow * http echo * /echo** http echo * /safe/** httpsrv -p{srv}STRING
HIGHtests/cases/httpsrv_parsing.py0log auth iponly allow * http echo * /echo** http echo * /safe/** httpsrv -p{srv}STRING
Deep Nesting7 hits · 7 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/run.py81CODE
LOWtests/harness.py209CODE
LOWtests/harness.py344CODE
LOWtests/harness.py367CODE
LOWtests/harness.py420CODE
LOWtests/harness.py435CODE
LOWtests/cases/ftppr.py17CODE
Excessive Try-Catch Wrapping3 hits · 4 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/run.py127 except Exception:CODE
LOWtests/harness.py664 except Exception:CODE
MEDIUMtests/harness.py80def output(self):CODE
Redundant / Tautological Comments1 hit · 2 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWscripts/postinstall.sh9# Check if user already existsCOMMENT
Unused Imports1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/harness.py31CODE
AI Structural Patterns1 hit · 1 pts
SeverityFileLineSnippetContext
LOWtests/harness.py282CODE